Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most serious chronic micro-vascular complications of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) worldwide, with reduced expectancy and quality of life and colossal financial and social burden worldwide. In spite of emerging treatments on DN, effective therapy on delaying the progression of DN is still lacking. In clinical practice, there are many studies focusing on Abelmoschus moschatus (AM) capsules together with Tripterygium glycoside (TG) tablets in the treatment of DN, and excellent results have been obtained.Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AM combined with TG in the treatment of DN.Methods: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WF, and VIP were searched from their inception to 1 March 2022. The “risk of bias” evaluation tool produced by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used for evaluating the quality of the included studies. Revman 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.Results: Here, 11 studies with a total of 1,072 participants were included for this meta-analysis. Our results showed that AM combined with TG plus basic treatment could lower levels of 24 h-UP [MD = -0.18; 95% CI: (-0.21, -0.14); p < 0.00001], Scr [MD = -15.29; 95% CI: (-28.69, -1.88); p = 0.03], and BUN [MD = -1.18; 95% CI: (-1.69, -0.68); p < 0.00001]. Meanwhile, the adverse reaction rate increased in the combination group [RR = 1.88; 95% CI (1.26, 2.82); p = 0.002].Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that AM combined with TG may be more effective in the treatment of DN, which will be highly beneficial to further theoretical discussion and practical clinical applications. However, the safety cannot be ignored because of nearly increasing 2-fold adverse events, although they can be mitigated through systematic treatment. Meanwhile, due to low quality of the included studies, great possibility of publication bias, and large heterogeneity among different studies, the results of our review should be evaluated with more prudence and high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm this in the future.Systematic review Registration:www.crd.york.ac.uk, identifier CRD42022344359.
ObjectiveClinical trials have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are closely associated with hepatic fibrosis and steatosis by FibroScan. This paper aimed at evaluating the effects of SGLT2i on hepatic fibrosis and steatosis, which are presented as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP).MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang Database were searched for randomized clinical trials from database establishment to 30 November 2022 with no language restrictions. The risk of bias was evaluated by Collaboration Handbook. Software Stata 17 and Review Manager (version 5.3) were used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of eight articles including 686 patients were included. Compared with the control group, our results showed that SGLT2i could lower levels of LSM [MD = −0.82, 95%CI (−1.38, −0.25), p = 0.005] and CAP [MD = −12.80, 95%CI (−20.57, −5.03), p = 0.001]. Further subgroup analyses indicated that SGLT2i presented more advantages on longer treatment duration and more serious steatosis in decreasing LSM. For CAP, SGLT2i exhibited a clear advantage in subgroup analyses of longer treatment duration, younger people, dapagliflozin, worse fibrosis, and steatosis.ConclusionSGLT2i could reduce LSM and CAP in contrast to other antihyperglycemic drugs. However, the included studies are not definitive, and well-designed, more multi-centered, blinded randomized clinical trials are warranted to definitively establish reliable evidence.
ObjectiveWe aimed to explore the value of Huobahuagen tablet (HBT) in improving decreased renal function for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) over time.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective, real-world study on eligible 122 DKD patients who continued to use HBT + Huangkui capsule (HKC) therapy or HKC therapy without interruption or alteration in Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine from July 2016 to March 2022. The primary observation outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up visits and changes in eGFR from baseline (ΔeGFR). Propensity score (PS) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to control for confounders.ResultseGFR was significantly higher in the HBT + HKC group than in the HKC alone group at the 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up visits (p = 0.0448, 0.0002, and 0.0037, respectively), indicating the superiority of HBT + HKC over HBT alone. Furthermore, the ΔeGFR of the HBT + HKC group was significantly higher than that of the HKC alone group at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits (p = 0.0369 and 0.0267, respectively). In the DKD G4 patients, eGFR was higher in the HBT + HKC group at the 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up visits compared with baseline, with statistically significant differences at the 1-, 3-, and 6- month follow-up visits (p = 0.0256, 0.0069, and 0.0252, respectively). The fluctuations in ΔeGFR ranged from 2.54 ± 4.34 to 5.01 ± 5.55 ml/min/1.73 m2. Change in the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio from baseline did not exhibit a significant difference between the two groups at any of the follow-up visits (p > 0.05 for all). Adverse event incidence was low in both groups.ConclusionThe findings of this study based on real-world clinical practice indicate that HBT + HKC therapy exhibited better efficacy in improving and protecting renal function with a favorable safety profile than HKC therapy alone. However, further large-scale prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.