The early management of patients who have sustained traumatic brain injury is aimed at preventing secondary brain injury through avoidance of cerebral hypoxia and hypoperfusion. Especially in hypotensive patients, it has been postulated that hypertonic crystalloids and colloids might support mean arterial pressure more effectively by expanding intravascular volume without causing problematic cerebral oedema. We conducted a systematic review to investigate if hypertonic saline or colloids result in better outcomes than isotonic crystalloid solutions, as well as to determine the safety of minimal volume resuscitation, or delayed versus immediate fluid resuscitation during prehospital care for patients with traumatic brain injury. We identified nine randomized controlled trials and one cohort study examined the effects of hypertonic solutions (with or without colloid added) for prehospital fluid resuscitation. None has reported better survival and functional outcomes over the use of isotonic crystalloids. The only trial of restrictive resuscitation strategies was underpowered to demonstrate its safety compared with aggressive early fluid resuscitation in head injured patients, and maintenance of cerebral perfusion remains the top priority.

No abstract

Background and Aims A renal risk score was recently developed to predict the risk of progression to end stage kidney disease (ESKD) in patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN). The score defines three risk groups, each with distinct renal survival at 36 months: 68% of high-risk patients reaching ESKD, compared to 26% and 0% in the medium- and low-risk groups, respectively. The majority of patients (101/115) used to define the risk score were treated with IV cyclophosphamide and steroids. At our centre, we employ a combined low-dose IV cyclophosphamide, rituximab and oral corticosteroid induction regimen, with or without plasma exchange (PEX) depending on disease severity, for ANCA-GN. A recent cohort study suggested this combination regimen may lead to better renal survival. We thus hypothesized that choice of remission-induction treatment may affect prediction accuracy of the risk tool. We retrospectively test the validity of the ANCA renal risk score in patients with ANCA-GN treated at our centre. Method All patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven ANCA-GN from 2006-19 were identified from local renal histopathology database. Patients with relapsing ANCA-GN, EGPA, other coexisting GN, or missing data on induction therapy or eventual renal outcome were excluded. ANCA-negative pauci-immune GN was included. Baseline demographics, ANCA serology, initial therapy and parameters in the ANCA risk score (including % normal glomeruli, % tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis (TAIF), and estimated glomerular filtration rate were collected. All patients were stratified using the risk tool and Kaplan Meier survival analysis was applied to examine the ESKD prediction. Subgroup analysis was then performed for patients who received the combination regimen of cyclophosphamide and rituximab. Results 178 patients with a median follow up of 44 month were included in the analysis. The median age was 62 years and 82 patients (46%) were female. 94(53%) were MPO-ANCA positive, 66(37%) PR3-ANCA positive, 15 (8%) ANCA-negative, and 3 (2%) were double PR3/MPO-ANCA positive. 148 (83%) patients received the combination regimen, and 45 had concurrent PEX. Total of 37 (21%) patients reached ESKD. 29 (78%) of these, developed ESKD within 36 months of initial diagnosis. Using the risk score, 64(36%), 76(43%) and 38(21%) patients were deemed low-, medium- and high-risk, respectively. Very distinct poor renal survival at 36 months was seen in high-risk group (55% reaching ESKD, p<0.01), but was less apparent between low- (95%) and medium-risk (90%)(p=0.052) (Figure1); In the subgroup of patients treated with combination regimen without concurrent PEX, the high-risk subgroup continues to demonstrate poor renal survival at 36 months (60% ESKD), but renal survival between low- and medium-risk group were comparable (0 and 2% respectively, p=0.57) (Figure 2). Conclusion In our cohort, the ANCA Renal Risk Score reliably predicted rapid ESKD progression at 36-month in high-risk patients, but was less accurate for distinguishing patients with low-and medium-risk. The subgroup analysis suggested combined cyclophosphamide and rituximab therapy may have modified long-term renal outcome especially in the medium-risk cohort, influencing the accuracy of the prediction tool. Large multi-centre cohorts are required to further evaluate the potential impact of treatment on predicting outcome.

Background and Aims Rituximab is a proven effective induction and remission-maintenance treatment in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Studies have identified hypogammaglobulinemia, infection, and late-onset neutropenia as potential adverse events. There is limited data on long-term outcomes following extended periods of B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab in AAV cohorts. We conducted a retrospective study to examine the safety profile of repeated rituximab treatment in AAV. Method All patients with AAV treated with rituximab between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2018 were identified through local dispensary database. Patients were stratified into low (≤4g), medium (>4g to ≤8g) and high (>8g) dose groups according to the cumulative rituximab dose received until 1st October 2019. Baseline characteristics and events including death, opportunistic and severe infections (defined as infections required hospitalization and/or intravenous antibiotic administration), neutropenia (neutrophil count ≤1.5x109/L), hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG level≤5.0), infusion reactions and malignancy diagnosed post-rituximab treatment were examined and compared between the groups. Results 364 patients (49% male, 52 year old mean age) received rituximab for treatment of active disease or remission maintenance. 49%(n=175) had repeat rituximab treatments (267/513 treatment courses for relapsing disease and 247/513 for remission maintenance). There were 262 (72%), 70(19%) and 32(9%) patients in low-, medium- and high-dose groups respectively. The median cumulative rituximab dose for each group was 2g, 6g and 12g (p<0.001). Low-dose group patients were older (59 and 40 years, p<0.001) and more likely to have renal-limited disease compared to high-dose groups (19%vs4%; p<0.05). Conversely, there were more ear-nose-throat (ENT) /ocular limited (41% and 13%; p<0.05) and antiproteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA positive disease (56% vs 38%, p<0.05) in high-dose compared to low-dose group. The overall median duration of follow up was 72 months (QR: 28-135months)(Table1). Outcomes (Table2): Infections: no difference in serious or opportunistic infection rate between groups (1.2 vs 0.1 vs 0.1infections/patient/year; p=0.18). 77% of opportunistic infections across all groups were related to herpesvirus (e.g. Cytomegalovirus/Herpes Zoster/Herpes Simplex) reactivation. Hypogammaglobulinemia: incidence was comparable between groups (9.7% vs 10% vs 9%, p=0.91). Overall median time to event was 5 months from first rituximab. Neutropenia: 101 patients had recorded neutropenia after rituximab (Low-dose: 32%; medium-dose 16% and High-dose: 22%, p<0.05). All were related to concurrent immunosuppressants (e.g. Azathioprine, cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate) or infection. Events resolved after withdrawal or reduction of concurrent immunosuppressant or treatment of underlying infection. Cancer: No difference in malignancy rate between groups (6% vs 14% vs 3%, p=0.22). 39 malignancies reported in 32 patients post rituximab treatment. The two commonest reported cancers were skin (36%) and breast cancer (21%) Deaths: 58 patients died during the study period. Mortality rate in the low and medium-dose groups were comparable (82% survival at 30 month after last rituximab). Conversely, there were no deaths in the high-dose group. Conclusion In this large, single-centre cohort of patients with AAV, we did not observe an increased incidence of adverse events with increasing cumulative rituximab exposure. This likely reflects physician bias in patient selection for repeat treatment and suggests that in selected patients, extended periods of rituximab treatment might be safe. The superior survival seen in high-dose group was likely related to higher proportion of ENT/ocular limited vasculitis.