Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) is a urodele amphibian endowed with remarkable regenerative capacities manifested in scarless wound healing and restoration of amputated limbs, which makes it a powerful experimental model for regenerative biology and medicine. Previous studies have utilized microarrays and RNA-Seq technologies for detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes in different phases of the axolotl limb regeneration. However, sufficient consistency may be lacking due to statistical limitations arising from intra-laboratory analyses. This study aims to bridge such gaps by performing an integrative analysis of publicly available microarray and RNA-Seq data from axolotl limb samples having comparable study designs using the “merging” method. A total of 351 genes were found DE in regenerative samples compared to the control in data of both technologies, showing an adjusted p-value < 0.01 and log fold change magnitudes >1. Downstream analyses illustrated consistent correlations of the directionality of DE genes within and between data of both technologies, as well as concordance with the literature on regeneration related biological processes. qRT-PCR analysis validated the observed expression level differences of five of the top DE genes. Future studies may benefit from the utilized concept and approach for enhanced statistical power and robust discovery of biomarkers of regeneration.
Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) is a urodele amphibian endowed with remarkable regenerative capacities manifested in scarless wound healing and full restoration of amputated limbs. Several regenerative cues of the axolotl limb were successfully unraveled due to the advent of highthroughput technologies and their employment in tackling research questions on several OMICS levels. The field of regenerative biology and medicine has therefore utilized the axolotl as a major and powerful experimental model. Studies which have previously unraveled differentially expressed (DE) genes en masse in different phases of the axolotl limb regeneration have primarily used microarrays and RNA-Seq technologies. However, as different labs are conducting such experiments, sufficient consistency may be lacking due to statistical limitations arising from limited number of sample replicates as well as possible differences in study designs.This study, therefore, aims to bridge such gaps by performing an integrative analysis of publicly available microarray and RNA-Seq data from axolotl limb samples having comparable study designs. Three biological groups were conceived for the analysis; homeostatic tissues (control group), from amputation/injury timepoint up to around 50 hours post amputation (wound healing group), and from 50 hours to 28 days post amputation/injury (regenerative group). Integrative analysis was separately carried out on the selected microarray and RNA-Seq data from axolotl limb samples using the "merging" method. Differential expression analysis was separately implemented on the processed data from both technologies using the R/Bioconductor "limma" package. A total of 1254 genes (adjusted P < 0.01) were found DE in regenerative samples compared to the control, out of which 351 showed magnitudes of Log Fold Changes (LogFC) > 1 and were identified as the top DE genes from data of both technologies. Downstream analyses illustrated consistent correlations of the logFCs of DE genes distributed among the biological comparisons, within and between both technologies. Gene ontology annotations demonstrated concordance with the literature on the biological process involved in the axolotl limb regeneration. qPCR analysis validated the observed gene expression level differences between regenerative and control samples for a set of five genes. Future studies may benefit from the utilized concept and approach for enhanced statistical power and robust discovery of biomarkers of regeneration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.