Summary Background 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03471494 . Findings Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit.

Background Multidisciplinary approach with adjuvant chemotherapy is the key element to provide optimal outcomes in pancreas and liver malignancies. However, post-operative complications may increase the interval between surgery and chemotherapy with negative oncologic effects. Hypothesis and study aim The aim of the study was to analyse whether compliance to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway was associated with decreased interval to adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Retrospective analysis of all consecutive ERAS patients with surgery for hepatobiliary or pancreatic malignancies at the University Hospital of Lausanne between 2012 and 2016. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of ERAS compliance on time to chemotherapy. Results A total of 133 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy were included (n = 44 liver and n = 89 pancreatic cancer). Median compliance to ERAS was 61% (IQR 55–67) for the study population, and median delay to chemotherapy was 49 days (IQR 39-61). Overall, compliance ≥ 67% to ERAS induced a significant reduction in the interval between surgery and chemotherapy for young patients (< 65 years old) with or without severe comorbidities (reduction of 22 and 10 days, respectively). High compliance in young ASA3 patients with liver colorectal metastases was associated with an increase of 481 days of DFS. Conclusions ERAS compliance ≥ 67% tends to be associated with a reduction in the delay to adjuvant chemotherapy for young patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies. More prospective studies with strict adhesion to the ERAS protocol are needed to confirm these results.

Background Although resection margin (R) status is a widely used prognostic factor after esophagectomy, the definition of positive margins (R1) is not universal. The Royal College of Pathologists considers R1 resection to be a distance less than 0.1 cm, whereas the College of American Pathologists considers it to be a distance of 0.0 cm. This study assessed the predictive value of R status after oncologic esophagectomy, comparing survival and recurrence among patients with R0 resection (> 0.1-cm clearance), R0+ resection (≤ 0.1-cm clearance), and R1 resection (0.0-cm clearance). Methods The study enrolled all eligible patients undergoing curative oncologic esophagectomy between 2012 and 2018. Clinicopathologic features, survival, and recurrence were compared for R0, R0+, and R1 patients. Categorical variables were compared with the chi-square or Fisher’s test, and continuous variables were compared with the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, whereas the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used for survival analysis. Results Among the 160 patients included in this study, 113 resections (70.6%) were R0, 34 (21.3%) were R0+, and 13 (8.1%) were R1. The R0 patients had a better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than the R0+ and R1 patients. The R0+ resection offered a lower long-term recurrence risk than the R1 resection, and the R status was independently associated with DFS, but not OS, in the multivariate analysis. Both the R0+ and R1 patients had significantly more adverse histologic features (lymphovascular and perineural invasion) than the R0 patients and experienced more distant and locoregional recurrence. Conclusions Although R status is an independent predictor of DFS after oncologic esophagectomy, the < 0.1-cm definition for R1 resection seems more appropriate than the 0.0-cm definition as an indicator of poor tumor biology, long-term recurrence, and survival.

No abstract

Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) due to internal hernia (IH) is a well-known late complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), with an incidence between 0.5 and 10% as reported by Iannelli et al. (Obes Surg. 17(10):1283–6, 2007). It is reported most frequently 1–2 years after surgery because of the greater weight loss at that time, with rapid loss of the mesenteric fat consequently as discussed by Stenberg et al. (Lancet. 387(10026):1397–404, 2016). Currently, women constitute more than 50% of the patients undergoing bariatric surgery and most of them are of childbearing age as reported by the World Health Organization (2015). SBO, due to IH, is a rare complication during pregnancy, mostly occurring during the third trimester as discussed by Torres-Villalobos et al. (Obes Surg 19(7):944–50, 2009), and can result in fetal and maternal morbidity and even mortality as reported by Vannevel et al. (Obstet Gynecol. 127(6):1013–20, 2016). Moreover, the physiologic changes of pregnancy can mask the symptoms of SBO after LRYGB, leading to significant diagnostic and therapeutic delays as detailed by Wax et al. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(4):265–71, 2013). Therefore, an early surgical exploration is necessary in this particular and uncommon situation as discussed by Webster et al. (Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(5):339–44, 2015). Methods A 32-year-old female patient, with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and chronic pain, was in the 28th week of her first pregnancy after bariatric surgery. She had had an antecolic LRYGB 6 years ago in another institution, resulting in a 35-kg weight loss. She presented to the emergency department with severe and persistent epigastric pain associated with nausea and vomiting during 24 h. On physical examination, her abdomen was painful and tender at the epigastrium and left hypochondrium, and her vital signs were normal. The blood tests were in the normal range except the white blood cell count at 12′000 G/l. The obstetric and neonatal team was involved, and fetal heart monitoring was normal. Abdominal ultrasonography ruled out other causes of pain. An abdominal MRI was performed and displayed a distended proximal small bowel, free abdominal fluid, and bowel mesenteric edema in the left upper quadrant with compression of the superior mesenteric vein. Internal hernia with intestinal suffering was suspected, and the patient consented for emergency laparoscopy. Results The laparoscopic exploration, reduction of the internal hernia, and closure of the mesenteric defects are demonstrated step-by-step in the presented intraoperative video. The postoperative course was uncomplicated for both patient and fetus. Oral feeding was resumed at day 1, with no residual symptom, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. At 1-month follow-up, she had no complaint and her pregnancy had resumed a normal course. She delivered a healthy baby at 36 weeks without any complication. Conclusions Internal herniation after LRYGB represents a rare, high-risk complication during pregnancy. A low threshold for imaging, preferably by abdominal MRI, is recommended. Multidisciplinary management, including obstetricians and bariatric surgeons, is necessary in order to avoid maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. During surgery, recognition of the anatomy is often difficult, and parts of the bowel are distended and fragile. Starting to run the bowel backwards from the ileocecal valve is a crucial surgical step for reducing internal hernias during LRYGB, and reduces both the risk to worsen the situation and of bowel injury, making its management less hazardous.