Emotion-cause pair extraction aims to extract all emotion clauses coupled with their cause clauses from a given document. Previous work employs two-step approaches, in which the first step extracts emotion clauses and cause clauses separately, and the second step trains a classifier to filter out negative pairs. However, such pipeline-style system for emotion-cause pair extraction is suboptimal because it suffers from error propagation and the two steps may not adapt to each other well. In this paper, we tackle emotion-cause pair extraction from a ranking perspective, i.e., ranking clause pair candidates in a document, and propose a onestep neural approach which emphasizes interclause modeling to perform end-to-end extraction. It models the interrelations between the clauses in a document to learn clause representations with graph attention, and enhances clause pair representations with kernel-based relative position embedding for effective ranking. Experimental results show that our approach significantly outperforms the current two-step systems, especially in the condition of extracting multiple pairs in one document.
Automatically verifying rumorous information has become an important and challenging task in natural language processing and social media analytics. Previous studies reveal that people's stances towards rumorous messages can provide indicative clues for identifying the veracity of rumors, and thus determining the stances of public reactions is a crucial preceding step for rumor veracity prediction. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical multi-task learning framework for jointly predicting rumor stance and veracity on Twitter, which consists of two components. The bottom component of our framework classifies the stances of tweets in a conversation discussing a rumor via modeling the structural property based on a novel graph convolutional network. The top component predicts the rumor veracity by exploiting the temporal dynamics of stance evolution. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that our method outperforms previous methods in both rumor stance classification and veracity prediction. Timeline 1 2 3 4 5 6Source tweet (originating a rumor): 1.Reply tweets: 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Support< l a t e x i t s h a 1 _ b a s e 6 4 = " L m F 7 u y l m E d U T 0 h / 2 S z Q h Z J C 2 F 1 0 = " > A A A B 7 n i c b V D L S g N B E O y N r x h f U Y 9 e F o P g K e y K o M e g F 4 8 R z Q O S J c x O Z p M h s z P D T K 8 Q Q j 7 C i w d F v P o 9 3 v w b J 8 k e N L G g o a j q p r s r 1 o J b D I J v r 7 C 2 v r G 5 V d w u 7 e z u 7 R + U D 4 + a V m W G s g Z V Q p l 2 T C w T X L I G c h S s r Q 0 j a S x Y K x 7 d z v z W E z O W K / m I Y 8 2 i l A w k T z g l 6 K T W Q 6 a 1 M t g r V 4 J q M I e / S s K c V C B H v V f + 6 v Y V z V I m k Q p i b S c M N E Y T Y p B T w a a l b m a Z J n R E B q z j q C Q p s 9 F k f u 7 U P 3 N K 3 0 + U c S X R n 6 u / J y Y k t X a c x q 4 z J T i 0 y 9 5 M / M / r Z J h c R x M u d Y Z M 0 s W i J B M + K n / 2 u 9 / n h l E U Y 0 c I N d z d 6 t M h M Y S i S 6 j k Q g i X X 1 4 l z Y t q G F T D + 8 t K 7 S a P o w g n c A r n E M I V 1 O A O 6 t A A C i N 4 h l d 4 8 7 T 3 4 r 1 7 H 4 v W g p f P H M M f e J 8 / n i m P v Q = = < / l a t e x i t > < l a t e x i t s h a 1 _ b a s e 6 4 = " L m F 7 u y l m E d U T 0 h / 2 S z Q h Z J C 2 F 1 0 = " > A A A B 7 n i c b V D L S g N B E O y N r x h f U Y 9 e F o P g K e y K o M e g F 4 8 R z Q O S J c x O Z p M h s z P D T K 8 Q Q j 7 C i w d F v P o 9 3 v w b J 8 k e N L G g o a j q p r s r 1 o J b D I J v r 7 C 2 v r G 5 V d w u 7 e z u 7 R + U D 4 + a V m W G s g Z V Q p l 2 T C w T X L I G c h S s r Q 0 j a S x Y K x 7 d z v z W E z O W K / m I Y 8 2 i l A w k T z g l 6 K T W Q 6 a 1 M t g r V 4 J q M I e / S s K c V C B H v V f + 6 v Y V z V I m k Q p i b S c M N E Y T Y p B T w a a l b m a Z J n R E B q z j q C Q p s 9 F k f u 7 U P 3 N K 3 0 + U c S X R n 6 u / J y Y k t X a c x q 4 z J T i 0 y 9 5 M / M / r Z J h c R x M u d Y Z M 0 s W i J B M + K n / 2 u 9 / n h l E U Y 0 c I N d z d 6 t M h M Y S i S 6 j k Q g i X X 1 4 l z Y t q G F T D + 8 t K 7 S a P o w g n c A r n E M I V 1 O A O 6 t A A C i N 4 h l d ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.