These results suggest that while visual cues can improve audiovisual speech recognition, they can also place an extra demand on processing resources with performance consequences for the word and tactile tasks under dual task conditions.
Older adults require more processing resources to understand speech in noise. Dual-task measures and subjective ratings tap different aspects of listening effort.
Background: Hearing loss and mild behavioral impairment (MBI), both non-cognitive markers of dementia, can be early warning signs of incident cognitive decline. Objective: We investigated the relationship between these markers and reported the influence of sex, using non-dementia participants (n = 219; 107 females) from the Canadian Comprehensive Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Dementia (COMPASS-ND). Methods: Hearing was assessed with the 10-item Hearing Handicap for the Elderly–Screening (HHIE-S) questionnaire, a speech-in-noise test, screening audiometry, and hearing aid use. MBI symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Multivariable linear regressions examined the association between hearing and MBI symptom severity and multiple logistic regressions examined the association between hearing and MBI domains. Results: HHIE-S score was significantly associated with greater global MBI symptom burden, and symptoms in the apathy and affective dysregulation domains. Objective measures of audiometric hearing loss and speech-in-noise testing as well as hearing aid use were not associated with global MBI symptom severity or the presence of MBI domain-specific symptoms. Males were older, had more audiometric and speech-in-noise hearing loss, higher rates of hearing-aid use, and showed more MBI symptoms than females, especially apathy. Conclusion: The HHIE-S, a subjective self-report measure that captures emotional and social aspects of hearing disability, was associated with informant-reported global MBI symptom burden, and more specifically the domains of affective dysregulation and apathy. These domains can be potential drivers of depression and social isolation. Hearing and behavior change can be assessed with non-invasive measures, adding value to a comprehensive dementia risk assessment.
BackgroundThe life-course model of modifiable risk factors for dementia now recognizes managing hearing loss and addressing social isolation.ObjectiveTo investigate the contribution and inter-relationship of hearing ability and behaviour change on cognitive ability.MethodsWe present the preliminary findings from a prospective longitudinal study of 35 non-demented participants ages 60–93, recruited from community rehabilitation and acute-care programs of Geriatric Medicine, who underwent baseline hearing, behavioural, and cognitive testing.ResultsAfter controlling for age and hearing impairment, the left ear Dichotic Digit Test (DDT) score accounted uniquely for 20% of the variance in MoCA Memory Index (p = .016 with β = .598). Mild Behavioural Impairment (MBI) was highly prevalent, with 80% of older adults reporting at least one MBI symptom. People with hearing impairment had greater global MBI burden than people with normal hearing, especially in the domains of apathy and impulse dyscontrol; however, greater severity of hearing impairment was not associated with a higher number of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS).ConclusionsLow left DDT contributed to lower memory index and greater MBI burden is associated with hearing impairment. Our findings demonstrate the value of early non-invasive hearing and behavioural assessments as part of dementia risk assessment in older adults.
Background Hearing loss and mild behavioral impairment (MBI) are both early warning signs of cognitive decline and dementia in older adults and have been recommended for use as non‐cognitive markers of dementia. To date, few studies have directly investigated the relationship between these two markers. Method Baseline data from 219 non‐demented participants (10 cognitively normal; CN, 48 subjective cognitive decline; SCD, 161 mild cognitive impairment; MCI) in the COMPASS‐ND study (February 2020 release) were analyzed. Hearing impairment was measured in three ways: with a 10‐item self‐report measure using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly – Screening Version (HHIE‐S), with a speech and noise test using the Canadian Digit Triplet Test (CDTT), and with screening audiometry using 2 discrete input levels at 2000 Hz to generate 6 hearing loss categories. Global and domain‐specific MBI burden was approximated using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) with a published algorithm. Multivariable linear regressions were conducted to examine the association between the three hearing impairment measures and global MBI burden, adjusting for sex, age, education, hearing aid use, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score or diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to investigate whether the hearing variables could predict MBI domains. Result Half of all participants showed MBI symptoms (Figure 1). Greater self‐reported hearing impairment measured by the HHIE‐S was significantly associated with greater global MBI burden and the presence of apathy and affective dysregulation when controlling for global cognition or diagnosis (Table 1). These associations remained significant in analyses restricted to MCI alone. Performance on CDTT and screening audiometry, were not associated with global or domain‐specific MBI burden. Conclusion The HHIE‐S, which was designed to capture the emotional and social aspects of hearing loss, was positively related to global MBI burden and more specifically to apathy and affect. Unlike audiometry and speech and noise measures, self‐reported measures of hearing impairment can be influenced by age, sex, other comorbidities, and social factors. Our findings underscore that value of self‐report measures of hearing impairment as distinct from audiometry and speech and noise measures in their association with behavioral impairment and as non‐cognitive markers of dementia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.