No abstract

Metabolic adaptation of the ischemic human heart includes release of lactate, augmented uptake of glucose and glutamate, together with increased release of citrate and alanine. In the present study exchanges of these metabolites were examined in relation to left ventricular function (LVF) in pig hearts during reperfusion after hypothermic cardioplegic-induced global ischemia and storage. Three groups of pig hearts were studied. Group I consisted of 11 hearts subjected to 9 minutes of warm ischemia prior to cold chemical cardioplegia with Bretschneider's cardioplegic solution (CCC), and hypothermic storage (HS), for a total of 180 minutes. Groups II and III, 8 hearts in each, were subjected to 90 and 180 minutes of CCC and HS, without precardioplegic warm ischemia. All hearts were reperfused in an isolated blood-perfused Langendorff model. Myocardial oxygen uptake and LVF were two-fold depressed in Group I compared to Groups II and III during the first 25 minutes of reperfusion. An increased uptake of glucose (p < 0.05) and augmented release of lactate (p < 0.01) and citrate (p < 0.001) were found during the reperfusion period in the hearts subjected to precardioplegic warm ischemia, indicating an increased total ischemic burden compared to Groups II and III. No significant changes in LVF or myocardial metabolism were noted between Groups II and III during reperfusion. In all three heart groups a substantial release or loss of glutamate was found at start of reperfusion, although in the preischemic state prior to cardioplegia pig hearts were found to extract glutamate from the circulation to an extent similar to that of the human heart.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

There are essential metabolic differences between cardiac and skeletal muscle. Low endomyocardial phosphocreatine levels are influenced by the biopsy technique, compromising the use of endomyocardial biopsies for establishing myocardial phosphocreatine content. Reliable measurements of adenine nucleotides and glycogen can be obtained with endomyocardial biopsies.

Background Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly implemented for the resection of colorectal cancer, although the scientific evidence for adopting this technique is still limited. This study’s main objective was to compare short-term complication rates, oncological outcomes, and the inflammatory stress response after colorectal resection for cancer performed laparoscopic or robot-assisted. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the robot-assisted approach to laparoscopic surgery for elective malignant colorectal neoplasm. Certified colorectal and da Vinci ® robotic surgeons performed resections at a Danish tertiary colorectal high volume center from May 2017 to March 2019. We analyzed the two surgical groups using uni- and multivariate regression analyses to detect differences in intra- and postoperative clinical outcomes and the inflammatory stress response. Results Two hundred and ninety-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Significant differences favoring robot-assisted surgery was demonstrated for; length of hospital stay (4 days, interquartile range (4, 5) versus 5 days, interquartile range (4–7), p < 0.001), and intraoperative blood loss (50 mL, interquartile range (20–100) versus 100 mL, interquartile range (50–150), p < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic surgery. The inflammatory stress response was significantly higher after laparoscopic compared to robot-assisted surgery reflected by an increase in C-reactive protein concentration (exponentiated coefficient = 1.23, 95% confidence interval (1.06–1.46), p = 0.008). No differences between the two groups were found concerning mortality, microradical resection rate, conversion to open surgery, and surgical or medical short-term complication rates. Conclusion Robot-assisted surgery is feasible and can be safely implemented for colorectal resections. The robot-assisted approach, when compared to laparoscopic surgery, was associated with improved intra- and postoperative outcomes. Extensive prospective studies are needed to determine the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Background Robot-assisted surgery is being increasingly adopted in treating colorectal cancer, and the transition from laparoscopic surgery to robot-assisted surgery is a trend. The evidence of the benefits of robot-assisted surgery is sparse. However, findings are associated with improved patient-related outcomes and overall morbidity rates compared to laparoscopic surgery. This induction is unclear, considering both surgical modalities are characterized as minimally invasive. This study aims to evaluate the systemic and peritoneal inflammatory stress response induced by robot-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopic surgery for elective colon cancer resections in a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods This study is a single-centre randomized controlled superiority trial with 50 colon cancer participants. The primary endpoint is the level of systemic inflammatory response expressed as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels between postoperative days one and three. Secondary endpoints include (i) levels of systemic inflammation in serum expressed by a panel of inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines measured during the first three postoperative days, (ii) postoperative surgical and medical complications (30 days) according to Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index, (iii) intraoperative blood loss, (iv) conversion rate to open surgery, (v) length of surgery, (vi) operative time, (vii) the number of harvested lymph nodes, and (viii) length of hospital stay. The exploratory endpoints are (i) levels of peritoneal inflammatory response in peritoneal fluid expressed by inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines between postoperative day one and three, (ii) patient-reported health-related quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15), (iii) 30 days mortality rate, (iv) heart rate variability and (v) gene transcript (mRNA) analysis. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first clinical randomized controlled trial to clarify the inflammatory stress response induced by robot-assisted or laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer resections. Trial registration This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04687384) on December, 29, 2020, Regional committee on health research ethics, Region of Southern Denmark (N75709) and Data Protection Agency, Hospital Sønderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Denmark (N20/46179).