BackgroundThis study describes time-trends on epidemiology, subtypes and histopathological entities of osteosarcoma (OS) in a nationwide and unselected cohort of OS patients in Norway between 1975 and 2009. Few nationwide studies are published, and we still have particularly limited knowledge regarding patients not included in clinical trials comprising about half of the OS population.MethodHistologically verified skeletal OS for all subgroups were included, resulting in 473 eligible cases from a total of 702 evaluated patients. To ensure completeness, the present cohort was based on all cases reported to the Norwegian Cancer Registry, complemented with data from all Norwegian hospitals involved in sarcoma management. Survival analyses were performed with overall and sarcoma-specific survival as endpoints.ResultsMean annual age-standard incidence amounted to about 3.8 per million in male and 2.8 per million in female with no clear time-trends. The male to female ratio was 1.4. Peak incidence was observed in the second decade for both genders. Conventional OS comprised 71.2% of all cases, while low grade OS represented 10.4% and telangiectatic OS only 1.3%. The most common primary site of OS was femur and tibia, respectively. The axial to appendicular ratio increased with the age. The overall 10-year survival did increase from about 30% during the late 1970s to around 50% 20 years later, with no subsequent improvement during the last two decades. Axial tumours, age above 40 years and overt metastatic disease at time of diagnosis were all negative prognostic factors.ConclusionNo improvement in the overall survival for OS since the 1990s was documented. The survival rates are still poor for elderly people, patients with axial disease and in the primary metastatic setting. The average incidence rate of skeletal OS in Norway was in line with international figures.

Increased detection rate in the lymph nodes is seen with serial sectioning or immunohistochemistry (IHC), but the importance of occult metastases is not resolved. IHC is still not recommended in routine examination of lymph nodes. Axillary lymph nodes from 385 node-negative breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 25 years were examined with IHC for cytokeratins, applied on routine sections. The association between classic histopathologic prognostic factors and the presence of occult metastases was evaluated. Metastases were found in 45 of 385 cases (12%), 21 metastases (47%) measured < or =0.2 mm, 8 (18%) were larger than 2 mm; 14 metastases were located in the subcapsular sinus, 22 in the parenchyma of the lymph node; and 51% (23/45) of the metastases were recognized on hematoxylin-eosin staining on "second look." The detection of metastases was significantly associated with the number of sectioned lymph nodes (6% metastases for one to five lymph nodes examined versus 17% for more than five lymph nodes) and with histologic subtype (metastases in 11% of the ductal versus 33% of the lobular carcinomas). No significant association was found between occult metastases and age, tumor size, histologic grade, estrogen or progesterone receptor status, p53, or c-erbB-2. Metastases larger than 2 mm predicted a poorer recurrence-free survival rate for the whole series. A subcapsular location of the metastases was a strong predictor of overall survival. Whether or not the metastases could be identified on hematoxylin-eosin sections did not have any prognostic significance. In the multivariate analysis, histologic grade, tumor size of the primary tumor, progesterone receptor status, and the presence of occult metastasis in the lymph nodes had a prognostic impact on survival with a 25-year follow-up.

No abstract

We evaluated the correlation between histologic and cytologic specimens in the determination of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status in breast carcinoma and investigated the causes of clinically significant discrepancies. We analyzed 70 immunoassays for ER and 60 for PR from 71 patients with breast carcinoma. Concordance between cytology and histology was 89% for ER and 63% for PR using scores from pathology reports. Concordance between cytology and histology was 98% for ER and 91% for PR using consensus scores (obtained after reevaluation by the team of pathologists). Thirty of 130 (23%) tests had clinically relevant discrepancies, 53% of which were caused by wrong interpretation of cytologic findings, 10% by wrong interpretation of histologic findings, 17% by sampling error and 20% were not available for reevaluation. Wrong interpretation of the results for ER and PR status in cytology was a far more frequent cause of clinically relevant discrepancies than sampling errors. The use of strict criteria is recommended.