No abstract

No abstract

Immigration has been historically and contemporarily racialized in the United States. Although each immigrant group has unique histories, current patterns, and specific experiences, racialized immigrant groups such as Latino, Asian, and Arab immigrants all experience health inequities that are not solely due to nativity or years of residence but also influenced by conditional citizenship and subjective sense of belonging or othering. Critical race theory and intersectionality provide a critical lens to consider how structural racism might uniquely impact the health of racialized immigrants, and to understand and intervene on the interlocking systems that shape these shared experiences and health consequences. We build on and synthesize the work of prior scholars to advance how society codifies structural disadvantages for racialized immigrants into governmental and institutional policies and how that affects health via three key pathways that emerged from our review of the literature: (1) formal racialization via immigration policy and citizenship status that curtails access to material and health resources and political and civic participation; (2) informal racialization via disproportionate immigration enforcement and criminalization including ongoing threats of detention and deportation; and (3) intersections with economic exploitation and disinvestment such as labor exploitation and neighborhood disinvestment. We hope this serves as a call to action to change the dominant narratives around immigrant health, provides conceptual and methodological recommendations to advance research, and illuminates the essential role of the public health sector to advocate for changes in other sectors including immigration policy, political rights, law enforcement, labor protections, and neighborhood investment, among others.

In response to the Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities’ (NIMHD) new health disparities research framework, we call on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to acknowledge Arabs in the United States as a health disparity population. Arab classification as White leads to their cultural invisibility and perpetuates a cycle of undocumented health disparities. We provide examples of how this contested identity reinforces challenges associated with identifying this population and contributes to enactments of structural violence and undocumented health disparities. Decades of research with Arabs in the United States provides consistent evidence that their health does not fit the health profile of White Americans and that Arabs do not benefit from Whiteness and White privilege associated with their White racial categorization. On the contrary, Arabs in the United States experience discrimination and health disparities that require urgent attention; this can be achieved only by identifying the population with a racial category other than White. We conclude with recommendations to NIH and NIMHD to revise their definition of health disparity populations to include Arabs in the United States.

Objective: Obesity in children is a serious public health concern. Technology-based games that incorporate physical activity and nutrition education create an opportunity to engage youth to promote healthy behavior change to help address the obesity problem. ''MyPlate Picks'' (MPP) is a new digital educational exergame designed to facilitate movement, provide knowledge, enhance motivation, and encourage behavior change related to healthy eating and physical activity in youth. This article describes the development, formative work, and initial evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes. Materials and Methods: Development and formative testing was conducted. MPP focuses on physical activity and three ''MyPlate'' nutrition education areas: ''make half your plate fruits and vegetables''; ''avoid oversized portions''; and ''drink water instead of sugary drinks''; and it provides opportunity for movement during gameplay. Two phases and multiple pilot groups of youth aged 7 to 13 years attending nutrition education programs (N = 48) were conducted by using single-group pre-post designs. The first phase (n = 21) examined individual and team gameplay, and the second phase (n = 27) focused only on team gameplay. A self-report survey included questions on knowledge, acceptability, and behavioral intention. Knowledge scores from gameplay logs were also examined for the individual gameplay group. Results: Across pilots, youth showed a mean increase of 11.8% on the knowledge survey. In-game knowledge scores in the individual gameplay group also showed a 12.5% increase in knowledge scores. Examination of post-gameplay behavioral intentions found strong reported intentions to eat more fruits and vegetables and get more physical activity. Majority of the youth reported that the game was a lot of fun. Conclusions: The formative work and initial evaluation of MPP shows promising results for knowledge and behavioral intentions. The youth reported that the team play approach was more fun. Future evaluation is needed to examine the game in larger groups and by using other implementation approaches.