BackgroundOver recent years there has been an increasing prevalence of verbal and physical violence in Israel, including in the work place. Physicians are exposed to violence in hospitals and in the community. The objective was to characterize acts of verbal and physical violence towards hospital- and community-based physicians.MethodsA convenience sample of physicians working in the hospital and community completed an anonymous questionnaire about their experience with violence. Data collection took place between November 2001 and July 2002. One hundred seventy seven physicians participated in the study, 95 from the hospital and 82 from community clinics. The community sample included general physicians, pediatricians, specialists and residents.ResultsNinety-nine physicians (56%) reported at least one act of verbal violence and 16 physicians (9%) reported exposure to at least one act of physical violence during the previous year. Fifty-one hospital physicians (53.7%) were exposed to verbal violence and 9 (9.5%) to physical violence. Forty-eight community physicians (58.5%) were exposed to verbal violence and 7 (8.5%) to physical violence. Seventeen community physicians (36.2%) compared to eleven hospital physicians (17.2%) said that the violence had a negative impact on their family and on their quality of life (p < 0.05). The most common causes of violence were long waiting time (46.2%), dissatisfaction with treatment (15.4%), and disagreement with the physician (10.3%).ConclusionVerbal and/or physical violence against physicians is common in both the hospital and in community clinics. The impatience that accompanies waiting times may have a cultural element. Shortening waiting times and providing more information to patients and families could reduce the rate of violence, but a cultural change may also be required.

It seems that many migraine patients choose not to use triptans after their first experience with the drug.

The mechanism of postherpetic neuralgia and PHI are not well understood and no single best treatment for postherpetic neuralgia and PHI is known. Clinical experience suggested that neuropathic itch may be more resistant to treatment than neuropathic pain. This immunocompromized patient with a severe disabling PHI responded to antihistaminic and anticonvulsant treatment.

To evaluate the degree of pain control among ambulatory cancer patients visiting the outpatient clinics of three oncology centers in south Israel, these patients were interviewed using the Brief Pain Inventory translated into Hebrew (BPI-Heb). Patients suffering from pain at least three times a week or reporting taking daily analgesics during the last two weeks were enrolled. Non-Hebrew speakers and patients too frail or ill were excluded. The study population included 218 subjects. Substantial pain was experienced by 77%, the majority was not adequately treated (81%), and 75% were undermedicated. The daily living activities of the majority of patients (64%) were moderately to severely impacted. Pain control was not associated with any of the sociodemographic or previous treatment profile variables, or by physicians' pain assessment. The physicians' and the patients' ratings of the extent to which pain interfered with the patients' activities fully agreed (+/-2) in fewer than half of the patients. Physicians estimated more severe pain levels, but underestimated its impact on everyday life. These data indicate that better pain control for ambulatory cancer patients is needed and that more information about patients' pain and its impact should be solicited. Further training of care providers is needed to improve the relief from cancer pain and the quality of life of patients.