Endovascular aneurysm repair with extension of the stent graft to the external iliac artery and embolization of the hypogastric artery was associated with more complications and worse long-term results compared with simple endovascular aneurysm repair.
Background
Early stage esophageal cancer has a low risk of lymph node metastasis. Therefore, an organ preserving endoscopic submucosal resection for tumors staged uT1 N0 has already been established. In case of non-curative dissection according to oncologic criteria esophagectomy has to be performed to achieve an oncologic resection.
Methods
Between 2010 and 2016 42 patients with early stage esophageal cancer underwent endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESD). We retrospectively evaluated the operative and pathologic outcome as well as disease free and overall survival in patients, who were operated on with esophagectomy because of non-curative endoscopic resection.
Results
5 of 42 (11.9%) had to be operated on: 3 patients with open abdominothoracal resektion with intrathoracal anastomosis, 1 patient with an open approach and a cervical anastomosis and 1 patient with an laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach but open intrathoracic anastomosis. Reasons for ongoing resection were three times R1 endoscopic resection, one L1 infiltration and one sm1-infiltration in a squamous cell carcinoma. There was no perioperative mortality. One anastomotic leakage was treated interventionally, one thoracic surgical site infection conservatively. One anastomotic leakage had to be resected, put on a saliva fistula and reconstructed with a colonic interponate. No recurrence of cancer is observed so far.
Conclusion
Esophagectomy after non-curative ESD shows no evidence for a worse oncologic outcome. There is no higher peri- and postoperative risk. This legitimates our step-up approach.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.