The overall hearing preservation rate for all implanted patients was 64%. Loss of residual hearing was significantly more observed in cases of cochleostomy and/or non-soft surgical techniques. No correlation was observed with age at implantation, gender, side of implant, device manufacturer, and presence of pre-lingual deafness vs post-lingual, full or partial electrode insertion. In addition, there was a small but significant decrease in hearing between pre-stimulation and post-stimulation audiograms at 6000 Hz.

No abstract

Cochlear implantation (CI) is now widely used to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals having severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, CI can lead to electrode insertion trauma (EIT) that can cause damage to sensory cells in the inner ear resulting in loss of residual hearing. Even with soft surgical techniques where there is minimal macroscopic damage, we can still observe the generation of molecular events that may initiate programmed cell death via various mechanisms such as oxidative stress, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and activation of the caspase pathway. In addition, individuals with CI may be exposed to noise trauma (NT) due to occupation and leisure activities that may affect their hearing ability. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the auditory community to determine the efficacy of drug-eluting electrodes for the protection of residual hearing. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of NT on implanted cochlea as well as the otoprotective efficacy of dexamethasone eluting electrode to implanted cochlea exposed to NT in a guinea pig model of CI. Animals were divided into five groups: EIT with dexamethasone eluting electrode exposed to NT; EIT exposed to NT; NT only; EIT only and naïve animals (control group). The hearing thresholds were determined by auditory brainstem recordings (ABRs). The cochlea was harvested and analyzed for transcript levels of inflammation, apoptosis and fibrosis genes. We observed that threshold shifts were significantly higher in EIT, NT or EIT + NT groups compared to naive animals at all the tested frequencies. The dexamethasone eluting electrode led to a significant decrease in hearing threshold shifts in implanted animals exposed to NT. Proapoptotic tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α, TNF-α receptor 1a (TNFαR1a)] and pro-fibrotic transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ) genes were more than two-fold up-regulated following EIT and EIT + NT compared to the control group. The use of dexamethasone releasing electrode significantly decreased the transcript levels of pro-apoptotic and pro-fibrotic genes. The dexamethasone releasing electrode has shown promising results for hearing protection in implanted animals exposed to NT. The results of this study suggest that dexamethasone releasing electrode holds great potential in developing effective treatment modalities for NT in the implanted cochlea.

Objective: To perform a systematic review of the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with otologic manifestations of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Databases Reviewed: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane. Methods: A systematic search for relevant published literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was done. Data was collected on demographics, otologic manifestations, specific diagnostic criteria fulfilled, common clinical, and imaging findings as well as medical and surgical treatments received. Results: Fifteen articles encompassing 219 patients met inclusion criteria including 8 case reports and 7 case series. The mean age was 52.8 (range of 24–70). The most common otologic presenting symptoms were hearing loss (76%), otitis media with effusion (44%), vertigo (22%), tinnitus (21%), and chronic otitis media (20%). The most common diagnostic criteria observed in these patients were paranasal sinus abnormalities (75%), asthma (66%), and eosinophilia >10% (44%). The most common treatment was systemic steroids (66%), followed by surgery (52%), with myringotomy with tube insertion (M&T) (32%) and endoscopic sinus surgery (21%) being the most prevalent. Thirty-four percent of patients received an immunosuppressive agent. Successful treatments included systemic steroids (23%), surgical modalities (13%) with M&T being the most common (7%), topical nasal steroids (12%), and cyclophosphamide (10%). Conclusion: Hearing loss and a middle ear effusion are the most common presenting otologic manifestations of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Sinonasal disease was more prevalent in patients with otologic manifestations. Primary treatment consists of systemic steroids and immunomodulation. M&T, endoscopic sinus surgery, and local steroid administration can be adjunctive measures to alleviate local disease. Level of Evidence: Level 1

We thank the patient for granting permission to publish this information.