These results suggest that activation of the sympathetic nervous system in patients with heart failure, specifically the cardiac sympathetic nerves, may contribute to the poor prognosis associated with severe heart failure. The data therefore provide a rationale for the use of drugs such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents in the management of patients with heart failure.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and may contribute to progression of cardiac dysfunction via hypoxia, elevated sympathetic nervous system activity, and systemic hypertension. Our aim was to assess the long-term effect of OSA treatment with nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on systolic heart function, sympathetic activity, blood pressure, and quality of life in patients with CHF. Fifty-five patients with CHF and OSA were randomized to 3 months of CPAP or control groups. End points were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, overnight urinary norepinephrine excretion, blood pressure, and quality of life. Nineteen patients in the CPAP group and 21 control subjects completed the study. Compared with the control group, CPAP treatment was associated with significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (delta 1.5 +/- 1.4% vs. 5.0 +/- 1.0%, respectively, p = 0.04), reductions in overnight urinary norepinephrine excretion (delta 1.6 +/- 3.7 vs. -9.9 +/- 3.6 nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.036), and improvements in quality of life. There were no significant changes in systemic blood pressure. In conclusion, treatment of OSA among patients with CHF leads to improvement in cardiac function, sympathetic activity, and quality of life.
Background-Recent studies suggest that acute pulmonary congestion induces hyperventilation and that hyperventilationrelated hypocapnia leads to ventilatory control instability and central sleep apnea. Whether chronic pulmonary congestion due to congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with central apnea is unknown. We hypothesized that CHF patients with central apnea would have greater pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) than patients without central apnea and that PCWP would correlate with central apnea severity. Methods and Results-Seventy-five stable CHF patients underwent right heart catheterization and, on the basis of overnight sleep studies, were divided into central apnea (nϭ33)
Previous small-scale studies of the effect of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) on prognosis in congestive heart failure (CHF) are either lacking or conflicting.The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the presence and type of SDB on mortality in a patient group with severe CHF referred to a specialised heart failure centre.Out of 78 patients ((mean¡SD) 53¡9 yrs, left ventricular ejection fraction 19.9¡7.2% and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 16.5¡8.3 mmHg) followed-up over a median period of 52 months, 29% had no apnoea (CHF-N), 28% had obstructive sleep apnoea (CHF-OSA) and 42% had central sleep apnoea (CHF-CSA). At 52 months, their overall mortality was 40%, and combined mortality and transplantation was 72%. Mortality rates were similar between the three apnoea groups. Survivors had a similar prevalence of SDB (71%) as the nonsurvivors (70%). Although a significant increase in mortality was evident at 500 days in those patients with either CHF-SDB or CHF-CSA as compared with CHF-N, this was not significant at final follow-up (52 months) using Kaplan Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis identified transplantation but not SDB type or severity as a significant predictor of survival.In conclusion, sleep-disordered breathing impacts upon early (500 day), but not longterm (52 month), mortality in a specialised heart failure centre. Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 735-740.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.