The Herschel ATLAS is the largest open-time key project that will be carried out on the Herschel Space Observatory. It will survey 570 deg2 of the extragalactic sky, 4 times larger than all the other Herschel extragalactic surveys combined, in five far-infrared and submillimeter bands. We describe the survey, the complementary multiwavelength data sets that will be combined with the Herschel data, and the six major science programs we are undertaking. Using new models based on a previous submillimeter survey of galaxies, we present predictions of the properties of the ATLAS sources in other wave bands
We discuss how the redshift dependence of the observed two-point correlation function of various classes of objects can be related to theoretical predictions. This relation involves first a calculation of the redshift evolution of the underlying matter correlations. The next step is to relate fluctuations in mass to those of any particular class of cosmic objects; in general terms, this means a model for the bias and how it evolves with cosmic epoch. Only after these two effects have been quantified can one perform an appropriate convolution of the non-linearly evolved two-point correlation function of the objects with their redshift distribution to obtain the 'observed' correlation function for a given sample. This convolution in itself tends to mask the effect of evolution by mixing amplitudes at different redshifts. We develop a formalism which incorporates these requirements and, in particular, a set of plausible models for the evolution of the bias factor. We apply this formalism to the spatial, angular and projected correlation functions from different samples of highredshift objects, assuming a simple phenomenological model for the initial power-spectrum and an Einstein-de Sitter cosmological model. We find that our model is roughly consistent with data on the evolution of QSO and galaxy clustering, but only if the effective degree of biasing is small. We discuss the differences between our analysis and other theoretical studies of clustering evolution and argue that the dominant barrier to making definitive predictions is uncertainty about the appropriate form of the bias and its evolution with cosmic epoch.
We discuss various analytical approximation methods for following the evolution of cosmological density perturbations into the strong (i.e. nonlinear) clustering regime. We start by giving a thorough treatment of linear gravitational instability in cosmological models and discussing the statistics of primordial density fluctuations produced in various scenarios of structure formation, and the role of non-baryonic dark matter. We critically review various methods for dealing with the non-linear evolution of density inhomogeneities, in the context of theories of the formation of galaxies and large-scale structure. These methods can be classified into five types: (i) simple extrapolations from linear theory, such as the high-peak model and the lognormal model; (ii) dynamical approximations, including the Zel'dovich approximation and its extensions; (iii) non-linear models based on purely geometric considerations, of which the main example is the Voronoi model; (iv) statistical solutions involving scaling arguments, such as the hierarchical closure ansatz for BBGKY, fractal models and the thermodynamic model of Saslaw; (v) numerical techniques based on particles and/or hydrodynamics. We compare the results of full dynamical evolution using particle codes and the various other approximation schemes. To put the models we discuss into perspective, we give a brief review of the observed properties of galaxy clustering and the statistical methods used to quantify it, such as correlation functions, power spectra, topology and spanning trees.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.