A simple method, primer specific and mispair extension analysis (PSMEA) with pfu DNA polymerase was developed for genotyping. PSMEA is based on the unique properties of 3'-->5' exonuclease proofreading activity. In the presence of an incomplete set of dNTPs, pfu was found to be extremely discriminative in nucleotide incorporation and proofreading at the initiation step of DNA synthesis, completely preventing primer extension when mispair(s) are found adjacent to the 3'-end of the primer. This has allowed us to accurately detect nucleotide variations, deletions and insertions for fast genotyping.

The diallelic enzyme α-L-fucosidase has been found to be highly active in semen. Eight distinct enzyme bands were observed in each homozygote and the heterozygote consisted of a combination of bands. The isoelectric points ranged between pI 4.34 and 6.65. Activity was found to be much lower in vaginal fluid, not more than three cathodal bands were visible in any sample examined. In leucocytes, 5 bands were detected in homozygotes whilst in serum only two faint anodal bands could be detected. Activity was low in vaginal fluid and could not be detected in urine or saliva. Population studies were carried out on semen samples from Oxford and Basingstoke and on lymphocyte samples from Oxford. The data were in agreement with Hardy-Weinburg equilibrium. The common allele (Fu 1) had a frequency of 0.704 in Oxford semen samples.

An investigation into isoenzymic analysis using four different buffer/gel systems was carried out. Fourteen different isoenzyme systems were surveyed on each buffer/gel system. It is shown that comparable results are not obtained between different systems. Previous workers in Cepaea nemoralis have used different buffer/gel systems from one another. Alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase and certain lactate and malate dehydrogenases are shown to behave similarly in three different systems. It is tentatively suggested that these isoenzymes may be genetically identical. "Nothing dehydrogenase" activity is demonstrated in gels stained for other dehydrogenases. It is suggested that nothing dehydrogenase activity may be attributable to glutamate or malate dehydrogenase.

No abstract

No abstract