No abstract

Most patients with suspected pulmonary embolism are initially investigated by radio-nuclide ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scanning. Approximately 70% of VQ scans are "indeterminate". Further investigations should be considered in such patients in order to establish a definitive diagnosis. However, these investigations are rarely requested in patients with indeterminate scans in our institution. We therefore decided to review the casenotes of such patients to determine their subsequent management. Over a 9 month period, 131 (32%) out of a total of 413 consecutive VQ scans were reported as indeterminate. The casenotes of 111 of these patients (65 female, 46 male, mean age 65 years, range 17-91 years) were reviewed. 52 of the 111 patients (46%) were treated on clinical grounds without further investigation; 12 patients (11%) had further investigation; and in 39 of the cases (35%) the VQ scan report was misinterpreted. 20 (38%) of the 52 patients managed on clinical grounds were treated for pulmonary embolus with anticoagulation and 26 (50%) were not anticoagulated. Of the 12 patients who were investigated further, nine had lower limb Doppler ultrasound and three had contrast venography. No patients had pulmonary angiography. Of the 39 cases where the VQ report was misinterpreted, the result was misquoted in the casenotes of 37 (95%) as negative for PE and none of these patients were anticoagulated, and in two cases (5%) it was misquoted as positive for PE and anticoagulant therapy was instituted. The misunderstanding was observed in all clinical firms. Such misinterpretation may have significant implications, since 30-40% of patients with indeterminate scans may have had PE. Our findings suggest that clinicians need to be better informed of the significance of an indeterminate VQ scan result.

This study was undertaken to determine whether the omission of a low-residue diet in the days leading up to barium enema resulted in poorer bowel preparation. 300 patients were randomized prospectively into one of two groups. One group followed a low-residue diet for the 3 days leading up to the study, the other continued their usual diet. Both groups had two doses of "Picolax" the day before the study. 17 patients did not attend, and a further two patients were excluded, leaving 281 patients for prospective study. The subsequent investigation was assessed blind by a consultant radiologist and graded for faecal residue, mucosal coating and diagnostic quality. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for amount of faecal residue (p < 0.25), mucosal coating (p < 0.25) or diagnostic quality (p < 0.5). We conclude, therefore, that a preliminary low-residue diet is unnecessary in the preparation of patients for barium enema. Patients should continue with their usual diet up to the day prior to the test and then have standard purgative preparation.

No abstract

No abstract