The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between subtle cardiovascular abnormalities and abnormal sodium handling in cirrhosis. A total of 35 biopsy-proven patients with cirrhosis with or without ascites and 14 age-matched controls underwent two-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide angiography for assessment of cardiac volumes, structural changes and systolic and diastolic functions under strict metabolic conditions of a sodium intake of 22 mmol/day. Cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and pressure/volume relationship (an index of cardiac contractility) were calculated. Eight controls and 14 patients with non-ascitic cirrhosis underwent repeat volume measurements and the pressure/volume relationship was re-evaluated after consuming a diet containing 200 mmol of sodium/day for 7 days. Ascitic cirrhotic patients had significant reductions in (i) cardiac pre-load (end diastolic volume 106+/-9 ml; P<0.05 compared with controls), due to relatively thicker left ventricular wall and septum (P<0.05); (ii) afterload (systemic vascular resistance 992+/-84 dyn.s.cm(-5); P<0. 05 compared with controls) due to systemic arterial vasodilatation; and (iii) reversal of the pressure/volume relationship, indicating contractility dysfunction. Increased cardiac output (6.12+/-0.45 litres/min; P<0.05 compared with controls) was due to a significantly increased heart rate. Pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients had contractile dysfunction, which was accentuated when challenged with a dietary sodium load, associated with renal sodium retention (urinary sodium excretion 162+/-12 mmol/day, compared with 197+/-12 mmol/day in controls; P<0.05). Cardiac output was maintained, since the pre-load was normal or increased, despite a mild degree of ventricular thickening, indicating some diastolic dysfunction. We conclude that: (i) contractile dysfunction is present in cirrhosis and is aggravated by a sodium load; (ii) an increased pre-load in the pre-ascitic patients compensates for the cardiac dysfunction; and (iii) in ascitic patients, a reduced afterload, manifested as systemic arterial vasodilatation, compensates for a reduced pre-load and contractile dysfunction. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy may well play a pathogenic role in the complications of cirrhosis.

Subtle cardiac abnormalities have been described in patients with cirrhosis. Natriuretic peptide hormones have been reported to be sensitive markers of early cardiac disease. We postulate that plasma levels of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide could be used as markers of cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the levels of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide and their relationship with cardiac structure and function in patients with cirrhosis. The study population comprised 36 patients with cirrhosis of mixed aetiologies, but with no cardiac symptoms; 19 of the patients had ascites and 17 did not. The subjects underwent (i) trans-thoracic two-dimensional echocardiography, and (ii) radionuclide angiography for measurements of cardiac structural parameters, diastolic and systolic function. Levels of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide were also measured. The results were compared with those from eight age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Compared with the controls, the baseline mean ejection fraction was increased significantly in both patient groups (P=0.02), together with prolonged deceleration times (P=0.03), left atrial enlargement (P=0.03) and interventricular septal thickening (P=0.02), findings that are compatible with diastolic dysfunction. Levels of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide were significantly higher in all patients with cirrhosis with ascites (P=0.01 and P=0.05 respectively), but in only some of the pre-ascitic cirrhotic patients, compared with controls. All high levels of brain natriuretic peptide were correlated significantly with septal thickness (P<0.01), left ventricular diameter at the end of diastole (P=0.02) and deceleration time (P<0.01). We conclude that elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide are related to interventricular septal thickness and the impairment of diastolic function in asymptomatic patients with cirrhosis. Levels of brain natriuretic peptide may prove to be useful as a marker for screening patients with cirrhosis for the presence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and thereby identifying such patients for further investigations.

Systemic arterial vasodilatation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of sodium retention in cirrhosis. Hydrophobic bile acids, which have vasodilatory actions, may be involved. Ursodeoxycholic acid, a hydrophilic bile acid, could potentially decrease systemic arterial vasodilatation, possibly due to its antioxidant effects, and improve sodium handling in cirrhosis. The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on systemic, renal and forearm haemodynamics, liver function and renal sodium handling were assessed in vasodilated cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites treated with a transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS). Eight cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites without TIPS placement served as controls for the sodium handling effects of ursodeoxycholic acid. From 1 month post TIPS, seven patients were studied before, after 1 month of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (15 mg.day-1.kg-1) and at 1 month follow-up. Lipid peroxidation products were used as indices of its antioxidant effects. Ursodeoxycholic acid caused a significant reduction in sodium excretion in both groups (P<0.05). This, in the post-TIPS patients (urinary sodium excretion: 35+/-8 mmol/day at 1 month versus 93+/-21 mmol/day at baseline, P<0.05), was due to a significant increase in sodium reabsorption proximal to the distal tubule (P<0.05), without any significant changes in systemic, renal or forearm haemodynamics, or in liver function. No significant change in lipid peroxidation products was observed. We conclude that: (i) in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites, ursodeoxycholic acid causes sodium retention, (ii) the abnormality in sodium handling in the post-TIPS cirrhotic patients appears to be the result of a direct effect on the proximal nephron, suggesting that factors other than systemic vasodilatation also contribute to sodium retention in cirrhosis, (iii) caution should be exercised in administering ursodeoxycholic acid in cirrhotic patients with ascites.