Bi-plane X-ray provides 3D measurements of the lower limb based on the identification of anatomical landmarks in sagittal and frontal X-rays. In clinical practice, such measurements involve multiple operators and sessions. This study aimed at evaluating the reliability of anatomical landmarks identification and geometric parameters of the pelvis and femur measured with bi-plane X-rays before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Twenty-eight patients undergoing primary THA were selected retrospectively. Two operators performed three reconstructions for each patient before and after THA. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were computed for intra-operator, inter-operator, and test–retest conditions. Most anatomical landmark positions had good to excellent SDC (< 5 mm) apart from the centre of the sacral slope, greater trochanter, and anterior superior iliac spines (up to 7.1, 16.9, and 21.5 mm respectively). Geometric parameters had moderate to excellent SDC, apart from femoral and stem torsion, pelvic incidence, and APP inclination with poor SDC (9–12°). The sagittal view had significantly higher measurement errors than the frontal view. Test–retest and inter-operator conditions had no significant differences suggesting a low influence of patient posture. Osteoarthritis and the presence of implants did not seem to influence reliability and measurement error. This study could be used as a reference when assessing lower limb structure with bi-plane X-rays.

Offsets in the frontal plane are important for hip function. Research on total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery agrees that increasing femoral offset up to 5 mm could improve functional outcome measures. The literature indicates that global offset is a key parameter that physicians should restore within 5 mm during surgery and avoid decreasing. Substantiated findings on acetabular offset are lacking despite its recognized importance, and the medialization approach must be assessed in light of its shortcomings. Future research, possibly through improved measurement, unified definitions, patient-specific surgical planning, and technology-enhanced surgical control, with specific focus on acetabular offset, is needed to better understand its impact on THA outcomes.

In the United States, approximately 600,000 patients undergo carpal tunnel release (CTR) annually for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). 1 CTR is an effective treatment to improve grip strength and decrease paresthesia in patients with CTS. 2,3 However, in up to 30% of patients, residual symptoms persist or recur, leading to revision surgery in up to 5%. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Although most studies suggest that the outcome after revision surgery is worse compared with single, initial CTR, some studies report outcomes comparable to single, initial CTR. [3][4][5][6]8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Nevertheless, these studies use different outcome metrics to determine a successful outcome, which makes comparison difficult. Other literature showed that factors such as age, sex, and surgical technique are associated with revision CTR, and that both relief of symptoms as well as recurrence may occur months to years after the first surgery. 5,9

The importance of the global offset, the sum of femoral and acetabular offset, has been underlined in the literature as a key factor for the functional outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the acetabular offset is not defined for bi-plane X-rays, a technology providing 3D measurements of the lower limb and commonly used for patients undergoing THA. The aim of this paper is to introduce a measurement method of the 3D acetabular offset with bi-plane X-rays. Our method combines the use of technical and anatomical coordinate systems. The most appropriate definition will be selected based on the best reliability and measurement error. The consequent reliability of the global offset was also assessed. Twenty-eight patients undergoing primary THA were selected retrospectively. Two operators performed three reconstructions for each patients before and after THA. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were computed for intra-operator, inter-operator and test–retest conditions for all combinations of technical and anatomical coordinate systems. ICCs were good to excellent. One combination was more reliable than others with a moderate mean SDC of 6.3 mm (4.3–8.7 mm) for the acetabular offset and a moderate mean SDC of 6.2 mm (5.6–6.7 mm) for the global offset. This is similar to the reliability and mean SDC of the femoral offset (4.8 mm) approved for clinical use which indicates that this method of acetabular offset measurement is appropriate. This opens a research avenue to better understand the role of the acetabular offset on THA outcomes, which seems overlooked in the literature.