No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARYReduced soil fertility and damage from pests and diseases have contributed to a decline in productivity of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) smallholdings in Sulawesi, Indonesia over the last decade. In a trial on a marginal, acidic soil in South Sulawesi, young PBC123 cocoa trees were supplied with compost, mineral fertiliser (NPK fertiliser and urea) or dolomite, alone and in combination. After 20 months, the trees supplied with compost were taller, flowered more profusely and had a five-fold higher dry bean yield than other treatments. Treatments had no impact on incidence of cocoa pod borer, Phytophthora pod rot and vascular streak dieback. All of the trees supplied with compost survived, while the control, mineral-fertiliser- and dolomite-treated trees had a mortality rate of 22–45% and symptoms of interveinal necrosis. Leaf concentrations of N, P and K were within the normal range in all treatments. In the control and mineral fertiliser treatments, leaf concentrations of Ca (0.28–0.30%) and Mg (0.11–0.15%) were deficient, but were higher in trees supplied with compost (0.78–1.21% and 0.26–0.29%, respectively). The Mg/K ratio in soil-exchangeable cations and leaves was increased three-fold by the combined compost/dolomite treatment. Supplying mineral fertiliser alone resulted in 3.3 cmol kg−1 exchangeable Al, compared to 2.2 cmol kg−1 in control soils. Since 10 kg tree−1 year−1 compost was supplied, a rate that is not practical on most cocoa smallholder farms, further investigation of cost-effective applications of organic matter in conjunction with appropriate formulations of inorganic fertilisers is recommended.

In Sulawesi, Indonesia, cocoa smallholdings are seriously affected by the cocoa pod borer (Conopomorpha cramerella, CPB). CPB is detrimental to both cocoa production and bean quality, and is a major concern to cocoa smallholders, processors, exporters and the international market. An Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)-funded project was initiated to develop a locally applicable, farmer-participatory methodology for selecting and testing promising cocoa genotypes on farms. In a trial established on a farm in SouthEast Sulawesi, local Indonesian and international cocoa selections were propagated clonally by side-grafting onto mature trees of mixed genotype and evaluated for 2 years for pod value, quality and resistance to pest/diseases. Local selections were based on the observations of farmers, extension officers or researchers and included a number of clones specifically selected for resistance (or susceptibility, as checks) to CPB. Our results on the CPB-infestation of 34 clones in the trial indicate the potential of employing on-farm selection and testing to improve cocoa farms. Severity of infestation was determined in ripe pods according to whether the proportion of beans damaged by CPB larvae was light (less than 10%), moderate (10-50%) or severe (over 50%). Total CPB incidence in ripe pods for most of the clones was high, exceeding 75%, and was correlated with severe and light incidence, both of which varied more. The data support a model that predicts severe infestation inflicting bean losses occurs above a critical threshold of total CPB incidence. The cumulative CPB incidence in infested pods was significantly lower in a local selection, Aryadi 2, which also had fewer larval entry holes and a low exit/entry ratio indicating a degree of resistance to CPB. The incidence of lightly infested pods was significantly lower in the susceptible controls. Pod hardness was moderately high in Aryadi 2. However, VSD3 (a local selection), Scavina12, KKM22 and BR25, had low levels of severe infestation and/or high incidences of light infestation, but had relatively soft pods. This suggests that factors in addition to pod hardness might be involved in resistance, a possibility also supported by the positive correlation of CPB incidence in ripe pods with that in immature pods and the larger seasonal fluctuations of CPB incidence observed in resistant clones, compared to susceptible clones. In a mixed genotype stand, the lower CPB incidence observed in some clones might be explained partly by pest non-preference.

No abstract