A prospective study was undertaken to examine the prognostic value for the symptomatic outcome of prostatic surgery of preoperative urodynamic testing in patients with prostatism. The study design included selection of patients for prostatic surgery by means of classic non-urodynamic urologic investigations such as history, residual urine, serum creatinine, cystoscopy and possibly intravenous urography. In addition an extensive urodynamic work-up (uroflowmetry, cystometry and pressure-flow study with stop-test) was included. The results of the urodynamic studies were unknown to the surgeon selecting the patients for operation. This evaluation was repeated 6 months postoperatively. Totally 139 patients entered the study. The patients were classified according to the preoperative maximum flow rate (Qmax) and in spite of preoperative differences in uroflow, pressure-flow variables and symptom scores, no differences of clinical significance were noted postoperatively among the groups. However, the high-flow group (preoperative Qmax greater than or equal to 15 ml/sec) had a statistically significant lower success rate as judged by the patients subjective evaluation of the outcome of surgery. An analysis of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity indicated Qmax = 15 ml/sec as a relevant cut-off value regarding preoperative identification of patients at risk of a less favourable outcome of surgery. This group of patients was characterized by a higher incidence of persistent uninhibited detrusor contractions at follow-up and a lower incidence of preoperative infravesical obstruction. In conclusion we recommend uroflowmetry in the preoperative evaluation of patients with prostatism.
Uroflowmetry and pressure-flow studies can predict to some degree the long-term result after prostatic surgery. There was a durable effect on symptom scores and maximum flow rates after the operation. The annual rate of repeat resection (1.8%) was relatively low.
Two hundred and fifty biopsy specimens from the contralateral testis in patients with unilateral germinal testicular cancer were analysed by light microscopy for carcinoma-in-situ changes. Changes were found in 13 (5 2%) patients. One-third of patients with an atrophic contralateral testis (volume <12 ml) and one-fifth of patients with a history of cryptorchidism had changes in the remaining testis. In the present series 85% of cases with carcinoma-in-situ changes would have been diagnosed if the one-fifth of the patients having an atrophic testis or a history of cryptorchidism or both had been screened.Since the natural course of carcinoma in situ in the contralateral testis of patients with germinal testicular cancer has not been established, the patients are being re-evaluated frequently. To date two patients with carcinoma in situ have developed a second cancer.
Uroflowmetry is important in the evaluation of prostatism. We have investigated 93 men, selected at random from the National Register, who had no subjective voiding problems but who fell within the appropriate age range. The sample was representative of the male metropolitan population. Uroflowmetry was carried out and the data are presented graphically in nomograms where the Q max/volume, Q average/volume and Q max time/volume relations are given. Flow variables were evaluated to delineate possible correlations to age. It was found that the median Q max decreased from 18.5 ml/s at the age of 50 years to 6.5 ml/s at 80 years. Only one-third of the group had a Q max exceeding 15 ml/s. The median voided volume was 208 ml. Half of the subjects voided less than 200 ml and one-third less than 150 ml.
Although this study did not prove estramustine phosphate to be superior to placebo in terms of protocol end points, it generates the hypothesis that prolonged survival may be achieved with estramustine phosphate treatment in a subgroup of patients and that this may be predicted by a decrease in PSA after 1 month of therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.