One hundred and one patients were randomly allocated to have their peripheral vascular surgery performed under general anaesthesia (51 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (50 patients). Intraoperative haemodynamic changes were markedly different between the two groups with a higher incidence of hypotension in the spinal group (72% vs 31%) and a higher incidence of hypertension in the general anaesthesia group (22% vs 0%). Blood loss was significantly less in the spinal group (560, SD 340, ml vs 792, SD 440, ml). Postoperatively three patients from the general anaesthesia group died from causes unrelated to the anaesthesia, and one had a myocardial infarct. Two patients in the spinal group had myocardial infarcts, both had been treated for bradycardia and hypotension intraoperatively, and one died. There was a significantly higher incidence of postoperative chest infection in the general anaesthesia group (33% vs 16%). There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of postoperative confusion, or lower limb amputation rate or need for further surgery prior to hospital discharge.
After routine inguinal herniorrhaphy we gave 12 patients a wound infiltration regimen of bolus doses of 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine via a catheter within the wound and rectally administered indomethacin (100 mg). Peak venous plasma bupivacaine concentrations ranged from 0.07 mg.l-1 to 1.14 mg.l-1 (mean (SD) 0.47 (0.33) mg.l-1), and occurred at between 0.25 and 2 h after the first dose. Plasma concentrations were well below the toxic threshold of 4 mg.l-1 and there was no accumulation. The regimen provided satisfactory analgesia. There were no wound infections nor signs of toxicity.
Twenty-jive patients having aortic surgery had blood scavenged using the Sorenson Receptal Device (Group A) and were compared with twenty-jive patients having homologous blood transfusion (Group H). Mean intraoperative blood loss was similar in both groups, Group A 3224 (SD 2392) ml, Group H 2999 (SD 1579) ml, but the mean homologous blood replacement was significantly different intraoperatively, Group A 1.2 (SD 1.7) units, Group H 2. 7 (SD 1.8) units. Total intra-hospital homologous blood replacement was not signijicantly different, Group A 4.0 (SD 3.4) units, Group H 5.5 (SD 5.8) units. Mean haemoglobin concentration in the scavenged blood was 8.5 (SD 2.1) g/dl compared to 10.8 (SD 2.4) g/dl in the median aged homologous blood units crossmatchedfor Group H. Mean red cell half life in the scavenged blood was the same as that for the homologous blood, 24 (SD 5) days, but plasma-free haemoglobin and bacterial contamination was greater in the scavenged blood. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction, coagulopathy or mortality between the two groups of patients.
Background and objectivesDocumentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia.MethodsFollowing the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%–74% agreement.ResultsSeventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29.ConclusionBy means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.