Navigated surgery is effective for patients with cam type FAI in helping restore normal anatomy, however, not without drawbacks. Larger studies will be required to validate our results.

PurposeRecurrent anterior shoulder instability after surgical treatment can be caused by bony defects. Several diagnostic tools have been designed to measure the extent of these bony lesions. Currently, there is no consensus which measurement tool to use and decide which type of surgery is most appropriate. We therefore performed an evaluation of agreement in surgeons’ preference of diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability.MethodsAn international survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. The survey contained questions about surgeons’ experience, clinical and radiological examination and the subsequent treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data, and percentages of responding surgeons were calculated.ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 197 delegates from 46 countries. 55 % of the respondents think evidence in current literature is sufficient on diagnostic work-up for anterior shoulder instability. Anamnestic, number of dislocations was most frequently asked (by 95 % of respondents), the most frequently used test is the apprehension test (91 %). For imaging, conventional X-ray in various directions was most performed, followed by MR arthrography and plane CT scan respectively. The responding surgeons perform surgery (labrum repair or Latarjet) in 51 % of the patients. A median of 25 % glenoid bone loss was given by the respondents, as cut-off from when to perform a bony repair.ConclusionMany different diagnostic examinations for assessing shoulder instability are used and a high variety is seen in the use of diagnostic tools. Also no consensus is seen in the use of different surgical options (arthroscopic and open procedures). This implies the need for more research on diagnostic imaging and the correlation with specific subsequent surgical treatment.Level of evidenceSurvey, level of evidence IV.

Background Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) presupposes a dynamic interaction of the proximal femur and acetabulum producing clinical symptoms and chondrolabral damage. Currently, FAI classification is based on alpha angle and center-edge angle measurements in a single plane. However, acetabular and femoral version and neck-shaft angle also influence FAI. Furthermore, each of these parameters has a reciprocal interaction with the others; for example, a shallow acetabulum delays impingement of the femoral head with the acetabular rim. Questions/purposes We introduce the new parameter ''omega zone,'' which combines five parameters into one: the alpha and center-edge angles, acetabular and femoral version, and neck-shaft angle. We sought to determine whether the omega zone could differentiate patients with FAI from (1) normal control subjects (alpha \ 55°), but also from (2) control subjects with elevated alpha angles (C 55°). Methods We evaluated CT data of 20 hips of male patients with symptomatic cam-type FAI and of 35 male hips extracted from 110 anonymized CT scans for vascular diagnosis. We excluded hips with osteoarthritis, developmental dysplasia, or coxa profunda (center-edge angle 20°-45°on AP pelvic view or corresponding coronal CT views). With dedicated software, femoral and pelvic orientation was standardized; we tested the omega zone in four hip positions in three distinct groups: patients with cam-type FAI (alpha [ 60°) and control subjects with normal (\ 55°) and high alpha angles (C 55°). Results The omega zone was smaller in patients with cam-type FAI than normal control subjects (alpha angle \ 55°) at 60°and 90°of flexion (mean, 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7-17; p = 0.008; Cohen's d = 9%; 95% CI, 4-13; p = 0.003). Furthermore, the omega zone was smaller in all positions in patients with cam-type FAI than control subjects with high alpha angles (0°p = 0.017, 30°p = 0.004, 60°p = 0.004, 90°p = 0.007). In contrast, the omega zone did not differ between control subjects with normal or high alpha angles. In all hips, the omega zone decreased with flexion, corresponding to a decrease in remaining impingement-free motion with flexion.

In shoulder arthroplasty, malpositioning of prostheses often leads to reduced postoperative range of motion (ROM) and complications such as impingement, loosening, and dislocation. Furthermore, the risk of impingement complications increases when reverse total prostheses are used. For this purpose a pre-operative planning system was developed that enables surgeons to perform a virtual shoulder replacement procedure. The present authors' pre-operative planning system simulates patient-specific bone-determined ROM meant to reduce the risk of impingement complications and to improve the ROM of patients undergoing shoulder replacement surgery. This paper describes a validation experiment with the purpose of ratifying the clinical applicability and usefulness of the ROM simulation module for shoulder replacement surgery. The experiment was performed on cadaveric shoulders. A data connection was set up between the software environment and an existing intra-operative guidance system to track the relative positions of the bones. This allowed the patient-specific surface models to be visualized within the software for the position and alignment of the tracked bones. For both shoulders, ROM measurements were recorded and tagged with relevant information such as the type of prosthesis and the type of movement that was performed. The observed ROM and occurrences of impingement were compared with the simulated equivalents. The median deviation between observed impingement angles and simulated impingement angles was -0.30 degrees with an interquartile range of 5.20 degrees (from -3.40 degrees to 1.80 degrees). It was concluded that the ROM simulator is sufficiently accurate to fulfil its role as a supportive instrument for orthopaedic surgeons during shoulder replacement surgery.

Objective Automatic segmentation for biochemical cartilage evaluation holds promise for an efficient and reader-independent analysis. This pilot study aims to investigate the feasibility and to compare delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) hip joint assessment with manual segmentation of acetabular and femoral head cartilage and dGEMRIC hip joint assessment using automatic surface and volume processing software at 3 Tesla. Design Three-dimensional (3D) dGEMRIC data sets of 6 patients with hip-related pathology were assessed (1) manually including multiplanar image reformatting and regions of interest (ROI) analysis and (2) automated by using a combined surface and volume processing software. For both techniques, T1 values were obtained in acetabular and femoral head cartilage at 7 regions (anterior, anterior-superior, superior-anterior, superior, superior-posterior, posterior-superior, and posterior) in central and peripheral portions. Correlation between both techniques was calculated utilizing Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results A high correlation between both techniques was observed for acetabular (ρ = 0.897; P < 0.001) and femoral head (ρ = 0.894; P < 0.001) cartilage in all analyzed regions of the hip joint (ρ between 0.755 and 0.955; P < 0.001). Conclusions Automatic cartilage segmentation with dGEMRIC assessment for hip joint cartilage evaluation seems feasible providing high to excellent correlation with manually performed ROI analysis. This technique is feasible for an objective, reader-independant and reliable assessment of biochemical cartilage status.