No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

IOP elevation after DSEK shows a high incidence. Pre-existing glaucoma increased the risk of developing IOP elevation and post-DSEK glaucoma. Although steroid-induced IOP elevation was the most frequent cause and could be treated effectively by tapering down steroid medication; there are other reasons why post-DSEK glaucoma developed. Management by medical treatment results in good visual acuity and graft survival.

ABSTRACT.Purpose: Transplant survival following penetrating keratoplasty is determined to a large extent by the course of endothelial cell density loss. Different influencing factors such as organ culture conditions, surgical trauma, exchange between donor and recipient cells, cell ageing and immune reactions can contribute to endothelial cell loss. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of endothelial cell loss in our patients and to detect dependencies on donor-and recipient-related factors. Methods: Using non-contact specular microscopy, endothelial cell counts were obtained every 6 months from 293 consecutive patients who underwent keratoplasty in our institution between 1996 and 2000. Follow-up time was 36 months. Results: In comparison with the density of donor endothelial cells, the mean endothelial cell loss of patients was 28.8% after 6 months, 39.8% after 12 months and 49% after 24 months. Donor age and initial cell density did not have a significant influence on the course of endothelial cell loss. The lowest rate of endothelial cell loss was associated with patients diagnosed with keratoconus. Conversely, those with preoperative glaucoma had a significantly increased rate of endothelial cell loss (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that preoperative glaucoma is a major risk factor for increased endothelial cell loss following keratoplasty.

Purpose In this retrospective study, the visual outcomes and postoperative complications after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in the fellow eye were compared. The patient's satisfaction was evaluated. Methods A retrospective analysis of 10 patients, who underwent DSAEK in one eye and DMEK surgery in their fellow eye, was performed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated, including higher-order aberrations (HOA) and contrast thresholds. A subjective questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction. Results Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly better in DMEK when compared with DSAEK (0.16 ± 0.10 vs 0.45 ± 0.58 logMAR, P ¼ 0.043). Contrast threshold was significantly higher after DMEK than after DSAEK (0.49 ± 0.23 vs 0.25±0.18, P ¼ 0.043). Post-keratoplasty astigmatism, mean spherical equivalent, and HOA did not differ. Nine out of ten patients preferred the DMEK procedure. Visual outcome (4.80 ± 1.14 vs 4.50 ± 1.58, P ¼ 0.257), surgery associated pain and burden (DMEK: 1.30 ± 0.48 vs DSAEK: 1.30 ± 0.48, P ¼ 1.0), estimated time for recovery and rehabilitation (27.6 ± 54.0 vs 24.9 ± 54.8 days, P ¼ 0.173), and mean patient satisfaction (5.40 ± 0.84 vs 5.00 ± 1.05, P ¼ 0.257) were evaluated equally. Conclusion Patient satisfaction reached high, equal values after DMEK and after DSAEK. Nevertheless, patients preferred DMEK, if given a choice. Reasons for the preference may include better uncorrected and BCVA, and especially a better contrast sensitivity.

Experimental exposure of corneal endothelial cells to higher concentrations of lidocaine resulted in significant cell loss, indicating that the 1% concentration only should be used clinically.