IMPORTANCEApproximately 1 in 5 patients with breast cancer who undergo axillary lymph node dissection will develop lymphedema. To appropriately triage and monitor these patients for timely diagnosis and treatment, robust risk models are required. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of mammographic breast density in estimating lymphedema severity.
The field of radiomics is at the forefront of personalized medicine. However, there are concerns regarding the robustness of its features against multiple medical imaging parameters and the performance of the predictive models built upon them. Therefore, our review aims to identify image perturbation factors (IPF) that most influence the robustness of radiomic features in biomedical research. We also provide insights into the validity and discrepancy of different methodologies applied to investigate the robustness of radiomic features. We selected 527 papers based on the primary criterion that the papers had imaging parameters that affected the reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from computed tomography (CT) images. We compared the reported performance of these parameters along with IPF in the eligible studies. We then proceeded to divide our studies into three groups based on the type of their IPF. The three groups were (i) scanner parameters, (ii) acquisition parameters and (iii) reconstruction parameters. Our review highlighted that the reconstruction algorithm was the most reproducible factor and shape along with Intensity histogram (IH) were the most robust radiomic features against variation in imaging parameters. This review identified substantial inconsistencies related to the methodology and the reporting style of the reviewed studies such as type of study performed, the metrics used for robustness, the feature extraction techniques, the imaging factors, the reporting style and their outcome inclusion. Finally, we hope the IPFs and the methodology inconsistencies identified will aid the scientific community in devising its research in a way that is more reproducible and avoids the pitfalls of previous analyses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.