Purpose To facilitate the transition of MALDI–MS Imaging (MALDI–MSI) from basic science to clinical application, it is necessary to analyze formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissues. The aim is to improve in situ tryptic digestion for MALDI–MSI of FFPE samples and determine if similar results would be reproducible if obtained from different sites. Experimental Design FFPE tissues (mouse intestine, human ovarian teratoma, tissue microarray of tumor entities sampled from three different sites) are prepared for MALDI–MSI. Samples are coated with trypsin using an automated sprayer then incubated using deliquescence to maintain a stable humid environment. After digestion, samples are sprayed with CHCA using the same spraying device and analyzed with a rapifleX MALDI Tissuetyper at 50 µm spatial resolution. Data are analyzed using flexImaging, SCiLS, and R. Results Trypsin application and digestion are identified as sources of variation and loss of spatial resolution in the MALDI–MSI of FFPE samples. Using the described workflow, it is possible to discriminate discrete histological features in different tissues and enabled different sites to generate images of similar quality when assessed by spatial segmentation and PCA. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance Spatial resolution and site‐to‐site reproducibility can be maintained by adhering to a standardized MALDI–MSI workflow.

Background: Amplification of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the gold standard to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the initial outbreak, strategies to detect and isolate patients have been important to avoid uncontrolled viral spread. Although testing capacities have been upscaled, there is still a need for reliable high throughput test systems, specifically those that require alternative consumables. Therefore, we tested and compared two different methods for the detection of viral PCR products: rRT-PCR and mass spectrometry (MS). Methods: Viral RNA was isolated and amplified from oro- or nasopharyngeal swabs. A total of 22 samples that tested positive and 22 samples that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR were analyzed by MS. Results of the rRT-PCR and the MS protocol were compared. Results: Results of rRT-PCR and the MS test system were in concordance in all samples. Time-to-results was faster for rRT-PCR. Hands-on-time was comparable in both assays. Conclusions: MS is a fast, reliable and cost-effective alternative for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from oral and nasopharyngeal swabs.

No abstract

Many studies have demonstrated that tissue phenotyping (tissue typing) based on mass spectrometric imaging data is possible; however, comprehensive studies assessing variation and classifier transferability are largely lacking. This study evaluated the generalization of tissue classification based on Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometric imaging (MSI) across measurements performed at different sites. Sections of a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of different formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tissue samples from different tumor entities (leiomyoma, seminoma, mantle cell lymphoma, melanoma, breast cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung) were prepared and measured by MALDI-MSI at different sites using a standard protocol (SOP). Technical variation was deliberately introduced on two separate measurements via a different sample preparation protocol and a MALDI Time of Flight mass spectrometer that was not tuned to optimal performance. Using standard data preprocessing, a classification accuracy of 91.4% per pixel was achieved for intrasite classifications. When applying a leave-one-site-out cross-validation strategy, accuracy per pixel over sites was 78.6% for the SOP-compliant data sets and as low as 36.1% for the mistuned instrument data set. Data preprocessing designed to remove technical variation while retaining biological information substantially increased classification accuracy for all data sets with SOP-compliant data sets improved to 94.3%. In particular, classification accuracy of the mistuned instrument data set improved to 81.3% and from 67.0% to 87.8% per pixel for the non-SOP-compliant data set. We demonstrate that MALDI-MSI-based tissue classification is possible across sites when applying histological annotation and an optimized data preprocessing pipeline to improve generalization of classifications over technical variation and increasing overall robustness.

No abstract