No abstract

Purpose Infectious diseases are more frequent and can be associated with worse outcomes in patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the available observational studies reporting the effect of diabetes on mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods The Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and medRxiv databases were reviewed for identification of eligible studies. A random effects model meta-analysis was used, and I 2 was utilized to assess the heterogeneity. In-hospital mortality was defined as the endpoint. Sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 18,506 patients were included in this meta-analysis (3713 diabetics and 14,793 non-diabetics). Patients with diabetes were associated with a higher risk of death compared with patients without diabetes (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.35–1.96; I 2 77.4%). The heterogeneity was high. A study-level meta-regression analysis was performed for all the important covariates, and no significant interactions were found between the covariates and the outcome of mortality. Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that that the likelihood of death seems to be higher in diabetic patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with non-diabetic patients. Further studies are needed to assess whether this association is independent or not, as well as to investigate the role of adequate glycemic control prior to infection with COVID-19. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s42000-020-00246-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Val)ganciclovir (vGCV) or foscarnet (FCN) as preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity, respectively. We analyzed a cohort of CMV-seropositive (R + ) HCT recipients managed preemptively at a single center. The objectives of our study were to (1) quantify the frequencies of neutropenia and acute kidney injury (AKI) through day +100 (D100) post-HCT and at PET discontinuation and (2) assess the impact of PET on neutropenia and AKI in multivariate models. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult CMV R + recipients who underwent allo-HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 18, 2013, through December 31, 2017, and were managed with PET. Patients were grouped by receipt of PET (PET and no PET). Neutropenia and AKI were defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Frequencies of toxicities by D100 were compared between relevant groups. The impact of PET on toxicities was examined in univariate and multivariate Poisson/ negative binomial regression models. Of 368 CMV R + HCT recipients, 208 (56.5%) received PET. Neutropenia by D100 occurred in 41.8% and 28.6% patients in PET and no PET, respectively (P = .0009). PET increased the risk of neutropenia (adjusted relative risk = 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.21; P < .0001) in multivariate analyses. AKI by D100 occurred in 12.0% and 7.8% patients in PET and no PET, respectively (P = .19). PET increased the risk of AKI by 2.75-fold (95% CI, 1.71 to 4.42; P < .0001). When PET recipients were grouped by first antiviral, neutropenia by D100 occurred in 34.8% and 48.9% of vGCV and FCN recipients, respectively, (P = .08), and AKI occurred in 13.0% and 34.0% of vGCV and FCN recipients, respectively (P = .001). At discontinuation of vGCV or FCN, neutropenia was present in 11.2% versus 2.1% patients, respectively (P = .08), and AKI was present in 1.9% of versus 12.8% patients respectively (P = .005). Preemptive therapy for CMV increased the risk of neutropenia and AKI in the first 100 days post-HCT by 1.8-fold and 2.8-fold, respectively. Our results underscore the need for safer antivirals for CMV management in HCT recipients.

Acute lower extremity proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) requires accurate diagnosis and treatment in order to prevent embolization and other complications. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), a clinician performed, and clinician interpreted bedside ultrasound examination has been increasingly used for DVT evaluation mainly in the urgent and critical care setting, but also in the ambulatory clinics and the medical wards. Studies have demonstrated that POCUS has excellent diagnostic accuracy for acute proximal DVT when performed by well-trained users. However, there is significant heterogeneity among studies on the necessary extent of training and universally acceptable standardized education protocols are needed. In this review, we summarize the evidence that supports the use of POCUS to diagnose acute proximal DVT and focus on methodology and current technology, sensitivity and specificity, pre-test probability and the role of D-dimer, time and resources, education, limitations, and future directions.