Conkright, WR, Beckner, ME, Sinnott, AM, Eagle, SR, Martin, BJ, Lagoy, AD, Proessl, F, Lovalekar, M, Doyle, TLA, Agostinelli, P, Sekel, NM, Flanagan, SD, Germain, A, Connaboy, C, and Nindl, BC. Neuromuscular performance and hormonal responses to military operational stress in men and women. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1296–1305, 2021—Women have recently been integrated into ground close combat positions; however, there are limited data in women in these roles. We aimed to test the hypothesis that there would be no sex-specific neuromuscular responses, but hormonal signaling would be differentially impacted when exposed to simulated military operational stress (SMOS). Neuromuscular performance was assessed daily using a tactical mobility test (TMT) in 54 male and 15 female military members. Blood was drawn before/after TMT. Mood states were assessed each morning. Unloaded 300-m shuttle time increased 6% in both sexes and remained 7% higher after 1 day of recovery compared with baseline (p < 0.05 for both), whereas performance was maintained in other TMT events (p > 0.05). Growth hormone increased in men, but not women, before to after TMT (p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.086). Women experienced a greater decline in insulin-like growth factor-I across days compared with men ( = 0.778 vs. 0.209, respectively, p < 0.001). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor increased significantly in men only from before to after TMT on day 1 (men: +107% vs. women: +10%) but no difference on days 3 or 4. Cortisol increased 69% from before to after TMT when averaged by sex and day. Negative mood states (depression, tension, and anger) and altered hormonal concentrations were associated with poorer TMT performance. Acute SMOS differentially impacted circulating hormonal milieu in men and women, but no differences in physical performance responses. Unloaded 300-m shuttle was negatively impacted while other fitness domains were maintained. Relationships between performance and mood/endocrine signaling highlight the potential for self-report measures and biomarkers to serve as indicators of performance change.
Central vascular function (stiffness, pressure wave energy transmission, hemodynamics) can impact high-flow end-organs such as the myocardium. Police officers, firefighters, emergency medical services personnel, and military personnel ("emergency responders" [ER]) experience more on-duty deaths from cardiac events than other occupational groups. As ER face unique occupational stressors, central vascular stress reactivity (CVSR) may contribute to cardiac risk. PURPOSE: Determine if ER have greater CVSR compared with non-ER (NER). METHODS: 9 ER and 9 age-, sex-, race-, and body fat-matched NER (n = 2 women; Table 1) had central vascular function assessed at rest and during 3 min of mental stress (Stroop). Potential covariates included: fasting cholesterol, lipids, and glucose from a fingerstick sample; physical activity via the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); and depressive symptomology from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). Aortic stiffness was assessed using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure carotid artery β stiffness, while Wave Intensity Analysis provided measures of pressure wave energy transmission. Carotid pressures were measured using applanation tonometry. CVSR was calculated as mental stress -resting. RESULTS: Groups had similar metabolic profiles and IPAQ scores (p ≥ 0.11). CESD score was greater in ER than NER (p = 0.04) and was used as a covariate for analyses. CVSR was similar between groups for all variables (p > 0.05; Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: Despite more depressive symptomology, ER do not have greater central vascular function changes to stress compared with NER, suggesting high resiliency during mental stress in ER.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.