No abstract

No abstract

The process of creating and administering traditional tagged anatomy laboratory examinations is time consuming for instructors and limits laboratory access for students. Depending on class size and the number of class, sections, creating, administering, and breaking down a tagged laboratory examination may involve one to two eight-hour days. During the time that a tagged examination is being created, student productivity may be reduced as the anatomy laboratory is inaccessible to students. Further, the type of questions that can be asked in a tagged laboratory examination may limit student assessment to lower level cognitive abilities and may limit the instructors' ability to assess the students' understanding of anatomical and clinical concepts. Anatomy is a foundational science in the Physical Therapy curriculum and a thorough understanding of anatomy is necessary to progress through the subsequent clinical courses. Physical therapy curricula have evolved to reflect the changing role of physical therapists to primary caregivers by introducing a greater scope of clinical courses earlier in the curriculum. Physical therapy students must have a thorough understanding of clinical anatomy early in the education process. However, traditional anatomy examination methods may not be reflective of the clinical thought processes required of physical therapy students. Traditional laboratory examination methods also reduce student productivity by limiting access during examination set-up and breakdown. To provide a greater complexity of questions and reduced overall laboratory time required for examinations, the Physical Therapy Program at Mercer University has introduced oral laboratory examinations for the gross anatomy course series.

Routine cadaver dissection has resulted in the identification of a fourth head of the triceps brachii muscle on the left side in one specimen. This novel arrangement demonstrated a single tendon arising from the proximal posteromedial aspect of the humeral shaft, distal to the shoulder capsule. The tendon of this fourth head passed along the medial aspect of the humerus and gave way to a muscle belly on the medial surface of the distal one-third of the humerus. The tendon of the fourth head passed directly over the neurovascular bundle containing the radial nerve and deep brachial artery at approximately the point where the neurovascular bundle entered the radial sulcus. This close positional relationship between the tendon of the fourth head, the radial nerve, and the deep brachial artery has prompted us to speculate on the possible clinical significance of this finding in relation to radial nerve palsy and arterial compression. Additionally, the position of the muscle belly, lying in close proximity to the ulnar groove, invites speculation on the role of the fourth head in cases of snapping elbow. To the authors' knowledge, a description of the muscular fourth head of the triceps as seen in the present work has not been noted in previous literature.

This case report demonstrates the importance of examining the work habits and work-related postures of a patient who complains of upper-extremity and neck pain that is exacerbated by work. Providing an ergonomic intervention in concert with traditional physical therapy may be the most beneficial course of treatment.