No abstract

This study compared pregnancy rates (PRs) and costs per calf born after fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) or AI after estrus detection (i.e., estrus detection and AI, EDAI), before and after a single PGF2α treatment in Bos indicus (Brahman-cross) heifers. On Day 0, the body weight, body condition score, and presence of a CL (46% of heifers) were determined. The heifers were then alternately allocated to one of two FTAI groups (FTAI-1, n = 139) and (FTAI-2, n = 141) and an EDAI group (n = 273). Heifers in the FTAI groups received an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (IPRD; 0.78 g of progesterone) and 1 mg of estradiol benzoate intramuscularly (im) on Day 0. Eight days later, the IPRD was removed and heifers received 500 μg of PGF2α and 300 IU of eCG im; 24 hours later, they received 1 mg estradiol benzoate im and were submitted to FTAI 30 to 34 hours later (54 and 58 hours after IPRD removal). Heifers in the FTAI-2 group started treatment 8 days after those in the FTAI-1 group. Heifers in the EDAI group were inseminated approximately 12 hours after the detection of estrus between Days 4 and 9 at which time the heifers that had not been detected in estrus received 500 μg of PGF2α im and EDAI continued until Day 13. Heifers in the FTAI groups had a higher overall PR (proportion pregnant as per the entire group) than the EDAI group (34.6% vs. 23.2%; P = 0.003), however, conception rate (PR of heifers submitted for AI) tended to favor the estrus detection group (34.6% vs. 44.1%; P = 0.059). The cost per AI calf born was estimated to be $267.67 and $291.37 for the FTAI and EDAI groups, respectively. It was concluded that in Brahman heifers typical of those annually mated in northern Australia FTAI compared with EDAI increases the number of heifers pregnant and reduces the cost per calf born.

We determined the metabolic effects of insulin derived from renal subcapsular islet grafts, either with systemic delivery of insulin through renal venous drainage (REN) or with portal delivery of insulin after renal vein-to-superior mesenteric vein anastomosis (RMA), in streptozotocin-induced diabetic Lewis rats, in comparison with normal rats. After gavage glucose, the plasma glucose responses were similar to normal in REN and RMA rats; however, hyperinsulinemia occurred in REN rats (area under the concentration curves [AUCs] of insulin, 27 +/- 3 nmol x 1(-l) min) in comparison with RMA (14 +/- 2) and normal rats (19 +/- 2), P < 0.003, with no difference in C-peptide responses. The ratio of AUC C-peptide to AUC insulin was lower in REN (2.0 +/- 0.2) than in RMA (3.4 +/- 0.3) and normal animals (3.2 +/- 0.3), P < 0.0005. In euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies using the same insulin infusion rate (10 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), insulin resistance was found in REN animals (mean glucose infusion rate [GIR], REN: 7.5 +/- 1.2; RMA: 12.0 +/- 1.2; normal: 12.7 +/- 1.0 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.008), with higher steady-state insulin levels in REN (554 +/- 63 pmol/l) than in RMA (291 +/- 26) and normal rats (269 +/- 60), P < 0.0001. With matching steady-state insulin levels in RMA and REN rats during infusion of insulin at 20 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1) in RMA rats (steady-state insulin 623 +/- 64 pmol/l), GIR was 15.7 +/- 0.7 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Thus, systemic delivery of insulin from islet grafts is associated with hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and decreased metabolic clearance of insulin. These abnormalities are prevented by portal delivery of insulin from islet grafts in the same site. The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that portal delivery of insulin is important in maintenance of normal whole-body insulin sensitivity.

A recent publication questioned the integrity of insulin purchased from U.S. retail pharmacies. We sought to independently validate the method used, isotope dilution solid-phase extraction (SPE) liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and expand analysis to two U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) methods (highperformance LC with ultraviolet detection and LC-MS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSEach method was used to evaluate nine insulin formulations, purchased at four pharmacies, within five geographic locations in the U.S. RESULTSAll human and analog insulins measured by the USP methods (n 5 174) contained the expected quantity of active insulin (100 6 5 units/mL). When using isotope dilution SPE-LC-MS, units-per-milliliter values were well below product labeling due to unequal recovery of the internal standard compared with target insulin. CONCLUSIONSInsulin purchased from U.S. pharmacies is consistent with product labeling.Insulin formulations are subjected to rigorous testing prior to their release from pharmaceutical manufacturers, as required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (1). However, a recent study by Carter and Heinemann (2) examined vials of regular and intermediate-acting NPH insulin purchased from local pharmacies in the U.S., and remarkably, almost none met the required standard of 100 units/mL (65 units/mL) set forward by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP). Insulin stability is of critical importance for both the safety and efficacy of diabetes treatment (3-5). Hence, the Carter and Heinemann (2) study, which did not use a USP-approved method, was widely recognized by both national and social media, raising concerns among care providers and patients whose confidence was disrupted regarding the potential reliability of insulin to reproducibly manage their disease (6,7). Therefore, we devised a well-powered and independent assessment of insulin products (e.g., vials vs. pens and human vs. analog) from major manufacturers using approved USP methods and comparable liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods (8,9), along with the method of the aforementioned report (2), to provide an assessment of the insulin concentration purchased at retail pharmacies.

No abstract