Summary. Urea transport across amphibian membranes is influenced by interactionswith the membrane, the solvent and other solutes. One case of solute interaction, that in which the two species are chemically identical, is investigated here. Because of the effects of hypertonic urea on permeability, the demonstration of interaction required consideration of the ratio r of bidirectional tracer permeabilities. Mucosal-to-serosal (M ~ S) and serosal-to-mucosal (M ~ S) tracer urea fluxes were determined in paired toad urinary bladders, in the absence and presence of abundant urea. In the control state, r was 1.0. Addition of 0.3 M urea to M increased r, and to S decreased r. These results indicate coupling of abundant and tracer urea flows (isotope interaction), probably occurring in specialized regions. The effects persisted after the addition of antidiuretic hormone, despite the opposing influence of osmotic water flow. Quantitatively different effects of mucosal and serosal hypertonicity, both with and without antidiuretic hormone, are explicable in terms of heterogeneous parallel and series permeability barriers.Because of the importance of urea in the renal concentrating system, the mechanism of its transport is of considerable interest. Amphibian epithelia are useful model systems for the study of this process and have directed attention to three types of interactions.First, interaction of urea or its congeners with the membrane, evaluated by tracer permeability in the frog skin and toad bladder, has allowed speculation as to the mechanism of permeation [2,15,17,19]. Second, interaction with water (solvent drag) has been cited as evidence that these compounds share a common pathway with water [2,17]. A third type of interaction, that of urea with other solute particles, has been observed in the frog skin and toad skin [3,10,12,22,23].