PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to create a “go-to-guide” of best practices in the creation of asynchronous courses. Due to the global pandemic, millions of students around the world transitioned from in-class instruction to online programs, which ranged from completely synchronous classrooms to completely asynchronous classrooms. Students were forced to learn how to engage within an online classroom environment with minimal notice and instructors were abruptly thrusted into a different operational environment, with many required to construct educational ecosystems in an unfamiliar and digitized interface. This led to several actions and the utilization of a multitude of different teaching techniques, many of which were poorly implemented.Design/methodology/approachKey words, “Asynchronous learning”, “Learning”, “Feedback”, “Online Instruction”, and “Classroom Design” were searched in online data bases (Google Scholar, PubMed, EBSCO and Data Base of Open Access Journals). These then were read by the authorial team and authoritative papers were selected by the team based on the frequency of utilization by other papers in the field and the utility of these papers for the design of asynchronous courses.FindingsThis paper explores asynchronous learning from the perspective of how instructional science and learning science can be applied to create the best classroom for both pupil and instructor.Originality/valueIt looks to provide a go-to-guide for best practices in asynchronous learning and the development of K-12 classrooms, graduate and medical school classrooms and finally continuous medical education classrooms. Finally, this guide looks to facilitate the development of master instructors through statements on how to properly provide feedback to students.

No abstract

No abstract

FundingNo funding was received from any organization to conduct the present study. AcknowledgmentsDr. Seung Choi for his work, kindness, and mentorship in the initial drafts and some critical feedback as the paper underwent several revisions. Thomas and Rhonda Varkey for grammar and editing work to ensure proper flow and ensure the readability of the different drafts. Elliot and Teresa Frohman for their constant encouragement of the team and discussions of these tests and how important they can be in keeping the patient at the heart of the work.