BackgroundCardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) installed in the CPB circuit on changes of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines levels, inflammation markers, and differences in patients’ perioperative course.MethodsIn this first pilot trial, 37 blinded patients were undergoing elective CPB surgery at the Medical University of Vienna and were randomly assigned to HA (n = 19) or control group (n = 18). The primary outcome was differences of cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IL-10) within the first five postoperative days. We also analyzed whether we can observe any differences in ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production, a reduction of high-mobility box group 1 (HMGB1), or other inflammatory markers. Additionally, measurements for fluid components, blood products, catecholamine treatment, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and 30-day mortality were analyzed.ResultsWe did not find differences in our primary outcome immediately following the HA treatment, although we observed differences for IL-10 24 hours after CPB (HA: median 0.3, interquartile range (IQR) 0–4.5; control: not traceable, P = 0.0347) and 48 hours after CPB (median 0, IQR 0–1.2 versus not traceable, P = 0.0185). We did not find any differences for IL-6 between both groups, and other cytokines were rarely expressed. We found differences in pretreatment levels of HMGB1 (HA: median 0, IQR 0–28.1; control: median 48.6, IQR 12.7–597.3, P = 0.02083) but no significant changes to post-treatment levels. No differences in inflammatory markers, fluid administration, blood substitution, catecholamines, BIA, or 30-day mortality were found.ConclusionsWe did not find any reduction of the pro-inflammatory response in our patients and therefore no changes in their perioperative course. However, IL-10 showed a longer-lasting anti-inflammatory effect. The clinical impact of prolonged IL-10 needs further evaluation. We also observed strong inter-individual differences in cytokine levels; therefore, patients with an exaggerated inflammatory response to CPB need to be identified. The implementation of HA during CPB was feasible.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01879176, registration date: June 7, 2013.
SummaryReparixin, a CXCR 1/2 antagonist, has been shown to mitigate ischaemiareperfusion injury (IRI) in various organ systems in animals, but data in humans are scarce. The aim of this double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reparixin to suppress IRI and inflammation in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients received either reparixin or placebo (n = 16 in each group) after induction of anaesthesia until 8 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared markers of systemic and pulmonary inflammation, surrogates of myocardial IRI and clinical outcomes using Mann-Whitney Uand Fisher's exact tests. Thirty-and 90-day mortality was 0% in both groups. No side effects were observed in the treatment group. Surgical revision, pleural and pericardial effusion, infection and atrial fibrillation rates were not different between groups. Reparixin significantly reduced the proportion of neutrophil granulocytes in blood at the beginning [49%, interquartile range (IQR) = 45-57 versus 58%, IQR = 53-66, P = 0·035], end (71%, IQR = 67-76 versus 79%, IQR = 71-83, P = 0·023) and 1 h after CPB (73%, IQR = 71-75 versus 77%, IQR = 72-80, P = 0·035). Reparixin patients required a lesser positive fluid balance during surgery (2575 ml, IQR = 2027-3080 versus 3200 ml, IQR = 2928-3778, P = 0·029) and during ICU stay (2603 ml, IQR = 1023-4288 versus 4200 ml, IQR = 2313-8160, P = 0·021). Numerically, more control patients required noradrenaline ≥ 0·11 μg/kg/min (50 versus 19%, P = 0·063) and dobutamine (50 versus 25%, P = 0·14). Therefore, administration of reparixin in CABG patients appears to be feasible and safe. It concurrently attenuated postoperative granulocytosis in peripheral blood.
Background: Upper-limb trauma is a common indication for surgery in children, and general anaesthesia remains the method of choice for these procedures, even though suitable techniques of brachial plexus block are available and fast provision of regional anaesthesia offers a number of distinct advantages. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the data of a large cohort of children undergoing ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks during a 4-yr period at a major trauma centre with a catchment area of 3.5 million. A total of 565 cases were sourced from two independently operating patient documentation systems. Patient data were stratified into age groups with block success as the primary outcome parameter. The influence of age on the incidence of block failure was assessed with logistic regression. Results: The block failure rate was 5.1%, starting at 1.2% in the youngest (0e3 yr), then continuously increasing up to 12.5% in the oldest (15e18 yr) but also smallest group. Age emerged as an independent predictor of block failure with an odds ratio of 1.115 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.014e1.226 (P¼0.025). No complications were observed. Conclusions: In a cohort of children receiving real-world care, with regional blocks performed by a range of anaesthetists with different skill levels, a success rate of 94.9% for upper-limb blocks in children under various levels of sedation was observed. Upper-limb blocks can be performed with high probability of success and an excellent margin of safety; this particularly applies to small children. Clinical trial registration: NCT03842423.
Surgical mortality of ruptured aneurysm repair was not independently related to advanced age but mainly driven by cardiac disease and manifest hypovolaemic shock. An almost normal long-term prognosis of aged patients after successful repair justifies even attempts of open repair, particularly in carefully selected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.