EMR for tumors larger than 4 cm is a safe and effective procedure that could compete with endoscopic submucosal dissection, despite providing incomplete histological assessment.

Summary Background Up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require hospitalization for severe flare. In patients hospitalised for severe flare, who previously experienced multiple drug failures, including steroids and anti‐TNF agents, new quick‐acting medical options are needed. Tofacitinib is effective in refractory UC and has a rapid onset of action. Aim To evaluate effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib as rescue therapy in patients hospitalised for UC flare. Methods We conducted an observational and multicentre study with both retrospective and prospective collections in 14 GETAID centres. The primary objective was to assess the survival without colectomy following tofacitinib initiation in patients hospitalised for a UC flare. We determined rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid‐free clinical remission at week 6 and week 14 and safety. Results Fifty‐five patients were included (49 with prior infliximab failure and 19 previously exposed to ciclosporin). With a median follow‐up of 6.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] [3‐12.3]), rate of colectomy‐free survival was estimated at 78.9% (95 CI [68.5‐90.9]) and 73.6% (95 CI [61.9‐87.3]) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Rates of clinical response, clinical remission and steroid‐free clinical remission were 60%, 45.5% and 37.5% at week 6 and 41.8%, 34.5% and 32.7% at week 14. Regarding safety, no death was observed, three patients withdrew tofacitinib due to adverse events. Two herpes zoster infections occurred in patients aged over 60 years old. No venous thrombotic or major adverse cardiovascular events occurred. Conclusion Tofacitinib appears as a promising option in patients hospitalised with a UC flare but needs further validation in controlled trials.

Objectives The results of only a few endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) have been published, and the safety of the procedure has never been investigated. Our study compared the recurrence rate in patients with and without preoperative EUS-FNA. Methods This European multicenter registry-based study was conducted in 22 digestive units, and retrospectively included all patients who underwent complete resection of a pancreatic SPN from 2000 to 2018. Patients with and without initial EUS-FNA were compared, and postsurgery recurrence and the associated risk factors were evaluated. Results A complete resection of a pancreatic SPN was performed in 149 patients (133 women, 89%), with a mean age of 34 (standard deviation, 14) years. There were no significant differences between the with (78 patients) and without (71 patients) EUS-FNA groups, except for age and tumor size and location. Preoperative EUS-FNA allowed pancreatic SPN diagnosis in 63/78 cases (81%). After a mean follow-up of 43 (standard deviation, 36) months, recurrence was noted in 4 patients (2.7%). Preoperative EUS-FNA was not correlated with recurrence, but an older age (P = 0.005) was significant. Conclusions Preoperative EUS-FNA does not affect pancreatic SPN recurrence. In this series, old age was significantly correlated with recurrence.

Background Up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require hospitalization for severe flare. In UC patients admitted who have already experienced multiple drug failures, including steroids and anti-TNF agents, new quick-acting medical options are needed. Tofacitinib is effective in refractory UC and has a rapid mechanism of action. It could be considered in this setting. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients hospitalized for an acute UC flare. Methods We conducted an observational and multicenter study with both retrospective and prospective collections in 14 GETAID tertiary IBD centers. The primary objective was to assess the survival without colectomy following tofacitinib initiation. We determined rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and clinical steroid-free remission at week 6 and week 14 and safety. Results Fifty-eight patients were included. All but one patient with active lupus were exposed to antiTNF. 50 (86.2%) patients have received infliximab and 18 (31%) to ciclosporin. Patients were previously exposed to a median of 2.5 lines of biologic treatment before tofacitinib.Median Lichtiger at inclusion was 11.5 (interquartile range IQR[9 - 13]), median CRP was 17 mg/l (IQR[6.5 - 67]) and total Mayo score was 10 (IQR[9.3 - 11]). Deep ulcerations were observed in 10 patients (17.2%).With a median follow-up of 6.5 months (IQR [2.9-12.4]), colectomy-free survival rates were estimated at 80.1% (95CI [70.1-91.4]) at 3 months and at 75.1% (95CI[64.1-88.1]) at 6 months. Rates of clinical response, clinical remission and clinical steroid-free remission were 60.3%, 46.6% and 37.9% at week 6 an, 48.1%, 37% and 35.2% at week 14, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 29 patients (50%) were still treated with tofacitinib. The survival without tofacitinib discontinuation was estimated at 82.8% (95CI[73.6-93.1), 67.8% (95CI[56.6-81.4]) and 46.2% (95CI[34.2-62.4]) at 1, 3, and 6 months (Figure 3).Regarding safety, no death was observed, three patients withdrew tofacitinib due to adverse events. Two herpes zosters occurred in patients aged over 60 years old. No thrombotic event occurred. Conclusion Tofacitinib appears as a promising option in patients hospitalized with a severe UC flare that needs further validation in prospective and controlled trials.

No abstract