Monitoring human exposure to pesticides and pesticide residues (PRs) remains crucial for informing public health policies, despite strict regulation of plant protection product and biocide use. We used 72 low-cost silicone wristbands as noninvasive passive samplers to assess cumulative 5-day exposure of 30 individuals to polar PRs. Ethyl acetate extraction and LC-MS/MS analysis were used for the identification of PRs. Thirty-one PRs were detected of which 15 PRs (48%) were detected only in worn wristbands, not in environmental controls. The PRs included 16 fungicides (52%), 8 insecticides (26%), 2 herbicides (6%), 3 pesticide derivatives (10%), 1 insect repellent (3%), and 1 pesticide synergist (3%). Five detected pesticides were not approved for plant protection use in the EU. Smoking and dietary habits that favor vegetable consumption were associated with higher numbers and higher cumulative concentrations of PRs in wristbands. Wristbands featured unique PR combinations. Our results suggest both environment and diet contributed to PR exposure in our study group. Silicone wristbands could serve as sensitive passive samplers to screen population-wide cumulative dietary and environmental exposure to authorized, unauthorized and banned pesticides.

The aim of this study is to assess the ability of three methods, alkaline elution (AE), nick translation (NT), and single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE), to detect DNA single-strand breaks (ssb) in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) exposed in vitro to three genotoxic agents; gamma-rays, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE). The ultimate objective is to select the most feasible, sensitive, and reproducible method for the monitoring of populations exposed to genotoxic agents. AE and NT do not seem suitable assays. AE is able to detect DNA lesions induced by the three compounds, but only at relatively high doses (2 Gy, 5 mM EMS and 20 microM BPDE). With NT, DNA alterations induced by gamma-rays are not detected and ssb are only evidenced after exposure to EMS (80 mM), which already alters the viability of the lymphocytes. Nick translation is able to detect ssb induced by 10 microM BPDE. Compared to the other assays, the sensitivity of the SCGE assay is significantly higher since statistically significant changes were detected after incubation with 0.5 mM EMS and 1.25 microM BDPE. SCGE is a relatively simple method, not time-consuming and applicable to a large number of samples per working day. In conclusion, on the basis of the results of this in vitro comparison, SCGE seems a promising method for the monitoring of populations exposed to genotoxic chemicals.

In an attempt to determine whether the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used as a rapid approach for the identification of aneuploidy in premalignant cervical smears, a centromeric probe for chromosome 1 was used. The results from the FISH experiments were compared with measurements of the overall DNA content obtained by means of an image analysis system. With progression to neoplasia, a decrease of the frequency of cells with two spots was observed, due to an increasing polysomy of chromosome 1. As far as the DNA content was concerned, an increasing DNA index and 5C-exceeding ratio (fraction of cells with a DNA content higher than 5C) was observed. Classification of the FISH results by a linear discriminant analysis revealed that 67.6% of the cases were classified in agreement with the CIN classification. These data suggest that chromosome I may be considered as a marker chromosome for pre-malignant cervical lesions and that the DNA content measurements are complementary to the FISH results.

No abstract