Introduction: A majority of US medical schools have incorporated faculty coach-supported educational portfolios into the curriculum. Existing research describes coach professional development, competencies, and program perceptions. However, limited research exists on how programs address coach professional development needs. Our sequential objectives were to (1) explore faculty coach professional development experiences within medical student coaching programs and (2) develop a preliminary framework for medical faculty coach professional development. Methods: Faculty portfolio coaches who completed 4 years of a longitudinal coaching program were recruited to complete a semi-structured exit interview. Interviews were transcribed using detailed transcription. Two analysts inductively generated a codebook of parent and child codes to identify themes. They compared themes to the professional development model proposed by O'Sullivan and Irby. Results: Of the 25 eligible coaches, 15 completed the interview. Our team organized themes into two broad domains paralleling the established model: program-specific professional development and career-relevant professional development. Four programspecific professional development themes emerged: doing; modeling; relating; and hosting. Three career-relevant professional development themes emerged: advancement; meaning; and understanding. We then applied themes within each domain to propose strategies to optimize coach professional development and develop a framework modeled after O'Sullivan and Irby. Discussion: To our knowledge, we propose the first portfolio coach-informed framework for professional development. Our work builds on established standards, expert opinion, and research responsible for portfolio coach professional development and competencies. Allied health institutions with portfolio coaching programs can apply the framework for professional development innovation.

Background: Relative to curative and traditional care delivery, hospice care has been associated with superior end of life (EOL) outcomes for both patient and caregiver. Still, comprehensive orientation and caregiver preparation for the transition to hospice is variable and often inadequate. From the perspective of the caregiver, it is unclear what information would better prepare them to support the transition of their loved one to hospice. Objectives: Our two sequential objectives were: 1) Explore caregivers’ experiences and perceptions on the transition of their loved one to hospice; and 2) Develop a preliminary checklist of considerations for a successful transition. Design: We conducted semi-structured interviews and used a descriptive inductive/deductive thematic analysis to identify themes. Subjects: 19 adult caregivers of patients across the United States who had enrolled in hospice and died in the year prior (January – December 2019). Measurements: An interview guide was iteratively developed based on prior literature and expanded through collaborative coding and group discussion. Results: Four key themes for inclusion in our framework emerged: hospice intake, preparedness, burden of care and hospice resources. Conclusions: Focusing on elements of our preliminary checklist, such as educating families on goals of hospice or offering opportunities for respite care, into the orientation procedures may be opportunities to improve satisfaction with the transition and the entirety of the hospice experience. Future directions include testing the effectiveness of the checklist and adapting for expanded poputlations.