Gamma hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is a naturally occurring analog of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) that has been used in research and clinical medicine for many years. In the past decade it has become very popular as a dietary supplement and recreational drug. Acute overdose leads to profound alteration of mental status and variable amounts of respiratory depression. With proper management, most patients recover fully within six hours. However, respiratory arrest and death have been reported in severe GHB intoxication. In addition to acute overdose, there is a GHB withdrawal syndrome that is similar to sedative/hypnotic and ethanol withdrawal. Recently several congeners of GHB, gamma butyrolactone and 1,4-butanediol, have emerged as drugs of abuse and show toxidromes similar to GHB. Emergency physicians should be familiar with the presentation and management of GHB-related emergencies.
The "10-Q" for review/position paper on how inter-hospital transports on Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is performed and organized in different health care systems in different parts of the world. How is the suggestion from to the ECMONet (Combes et al 2014) regarding the Hub-and-Spoke model with the larger ECMO centre in the middle who provide the service performing as compared to other models, for example Japan with multiple ECMO centers all doing their own transfers (?), or United Kingdom who transfer to five major hospital for adult ECMO.This study is an investigation planned and designed by the ECMO European Advisory Board (EEAB), an independent consortium for the development and research in all matters related to Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are modalities used in critically ill patients suffering organ failure and metabolic derangements. Although the effects of CRRT have been extensively studied, the impact of simultaneous CRRT and ECMO is less well described. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and the impact of CRRT on outcomes of patients receiving ECMO. Methods: A single center, retrospective chart review was conducted for patients receiving ECMO therapy over a 6-year period. Patients who underwent combined ECMO and CRRT were compared to those who underwent ECMO alone. Intergroup statistical comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon/ Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality.
Results:The demographic and clinical data of 92 patients who underwent ECMO at our center were reviewed including primary diagnosis, indications for and mode of ECMO support, illness severity, oxygenation index, vasopressor requirement, and presence of acute kidney injury. In those patients that required ECMO with CRRT, we reviewed urine output prior to initiation, modality used, prescribed dose, net fluid balance after 72 h, requirement of renal replacement therapy (RRT) at discharge, and use of diuretics prior to RRT initiation. Our primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge. During the study period, 48 patients required the combination of ECMO with CRRT. Twenty-nine of these patients survived to hospital discharge. Of the 29 survivors, 6 were dialysis dependent at hospital discharge. The mortality rate was 39.5% with combined ECMO/CRRT compared to 31.4% among those receiving ECMO alone (p = 0.074). Of those receiving combined therapy, nonsurvivors were more likely to have a significantly positive net fluid balance at 72 h (p = 0.001). A multivariate linear regression analysis showed net positive fluid balance and increased age were independently associated with mortality. Conclusions: Use of CRRT is prevalent among patients undergoing ECMO, with over
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.