No abstract

Aims/hypothesis Hypoxia may contribute to beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes and islet transplantation. The adaptive unfolded protein response (UPR) is required for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis. Here we investigated whether or not hypoxia regulates the UPR in beta cells and the role the adaptive UPR plays during hypoxic stress. Methods Mouse islets and MIN6 cells were exposed to various oxygen (O 2 ) tensions. DNA-damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3), hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIF)1α and HSPA5 were knocked down using small interfering (si)RNA; Hspa5 was also overexpressed. db/db mice were used. Results Hypoxia-response genes were upregulated in vivo in the islets of diabetic, but not prediabetic, db/db mice. In isolated mouse islets and MIN6 cells, O 2 deprivation (1-5% vs 20%; 4-24 h) markedly reduced the expression of adaptive UPR genes, including Hspa5, Hsp90b1, Fkbp11 and spliced Xbp1. Coatomer protein complex genes (Copa, Cope, Copg [also known as Copg1], Copz1 and Copz2) and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking were also reduced, whereas apoptotic genes (Ddit3, Atf3 and Trb3 [also known as Trib3]), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation and cell death were increased. Inhibition of JNK, but not HIF1α, restored adaptive UPR gene expression and ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking while protecting against apoptotic genes and cell death following hypoxia. DDIT3 knockdown delayed the loss of the adaptive UPR and partially protected against hypoxia-induced cell death. The latter response was prevented by HSPA5 knockdown. Finally, Hspa5 overexpression significantly protected against hypoxia-induced cell death. Conclusions/interpretation Hypoxia inhibits the adaptive UPR in beta cells via JNK and DDIT3 activation, but independently of HIF1α. Downregulation of the adaptive UPR contributes to reduced ER-to-Golgi protein trafficking and increased beta cell death during hypoxic stress.

Microglia are the resident macrophages of the central nervous system (CNS). They are a heterogenous, exquisitely responsive, and highly plastic cell population, which enables them to perform diverse roles. They sense and respond to the local production of many different signals, including an assorted range of cytokines. Microglia respond strongly to interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) and members of the type I interferon (IFN‐I) family, IFN‐alpha (IFN‐α), and IFN‐beta (IFN‐β). Although these cytokines are essential in maintaining homeostasis and for activating and regulating immune responses, their chronic production has been linked to the development of distinct human neurological diseases, termed “cerebral cytokinopathies.” IL‐6 and IFN‐α have been identified as key mediators in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammatory disorders including neuromyelitis optica and Aicardi‐Goutières syndrome, respectively, whereas IFN‐β has an emerging role as a causal factor in age‐associated cognitive decline. One of the key features that unites these diseases is the presence of highly reactive microglia. The current understanding is that microglia contribute to the development of cerebral cytokinopathies and represent an important therapeutic target. However, it remains to be resolved whether microglia have beneficial or detrimental effects. Here we review and discuss what is currently known about the microglial response to IL‐6 and IFN‐I, based on both animal models and clinical studies. Foundational knowledge regarding the microglial response to IL‐6 and IFN‐I is now being used to devise therapeutic strategies to ameliorate neuroinflammation and promote repair: either through targeting microglia, or by targeting the reduction of CNS levels or downstream biological pathways of IL‐6 or IFN‐I.