Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in combination with the dietary supplement Tendisulfur Forte in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathy, lateral epicondylitis, and Achilles tendinopathy. Methods: Patients were sub-divided for each pathology into two equal sized groups of 15: one treated with ESWT supplemented with Tendisulfur Forte, and the other treated with ESWT only. Shoulder functionality was measured through the UCLA shoulder score. Treatment of epicondylitis was assessed with the Mayo elbow score. Achilles tendinopathy was measured with the VISA-A score. Pain through the various groups of the study was measures with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Patients in the Tendisulfur Forte group had overall better functional and VAS scale scores for shoulder tendinopathy, elbow epicondylitis, and Achilles tendinopathy. UCLA scores for shoulder tendinopathy showed significant results at 60 days in the Tendisulfur Forte group ( p = 0.0002). Mayo scores in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis was significant at 60 days in the study group ( p < 0.0001). Achilles tendinopathy was improved in the study group at 30 days ( p < 0.0001). VAS scales were significant for each pathology at 60 days ( p < 0.0001). In addition, NSAIDs consumption was greatly reduced and, in most cases, stopped in the Tendisulfur Forte Groups. Conclusion: Concerning the results obtained, this paper underlines the effectiveness of combined treatment of ESWT plus Tendisulfur Forte, in the absence of side-effects. Indeed, oral supplementation lead to a faster recovery and better outcomes with a significant reduction in NSAIDs consumption.

Objective Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a condition that has been increasingly recognized as a source of hip pain and a possible risk factor to early development of hip osteoarthritis (OA). To our knowledge, the use of HA in the treatment of femoroacetabular FAI has been investigated only by two studies, both using a high molecular weight HA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two weekly injections of an hexadecylamide derivative of HA (HYADD4-G, HYMOVIS, Fidia Farmaceutici) in FAI. Methods All patients received two weekly intra-articular injections of Hymovis at baseline and after 7 days. Clinical and functional assessments were performed at baseline and was repeated after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Functional measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Harris Hip score (HHS), Lequesne Index (LI), Tegner activity level scale (TALS) and monthly consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Results Twenty-one hips (19 patients, 2 bilateral cases) were treated. The variables VAS, HHS as well as Lequesne improved significantly from T0 to T4 (at 12 months) with the best improvement between T0 and T1. At the same time, a reduction in NSAIDs monthly intake was registered. On the other hand, a significant improvement in Tegner scale was not observed. No adverse events were registered. Conclusion This study states that one cycle of HYADD4-G could be a safe and effective treatment in patients with FAI, showing significative results in term of pain control as well as hip functionality and quality of life up to 1 year.

No abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential ability of autologous conditioned serum (ACS) to decrease pain and improve joint functionality in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Fifteen patients with clinical and radiological signs of OA of the knee were recruited for this study. Each patient received 4 injections of ACS (Orthokine; orthogen, Dusseldorf, Germany) at the site of OA once per week for 4 weeks. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the VAS scale for pain, WOMAC scale and KSS functional and clinical scores before the first injection, at one week, at two weeks, at three weeks, at one month and at six months. Statistical analysis was done with the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Results: Our results show an improvement of all the evaluation scales at 6 months follow-up. Particularly, VAS scales among all patients decreased by 35.8% (p ¼ .00148), KSS functional scores improved by 38.2% (p ¼ .00148), KSS clinical scores improved by 28.9% (p ¼ .00236) and WOMAC scores were reduced by 19.8% (p ¼ .00188). Few adverse effects were observed in our sample. The most common complaint was pain and swelling in the subsequent days after performing the intraarticular injection. Only one patient reported rigidity following the injection of the ACS. Conclusion: Our results, in conjunction with preexisting studies in the medical literature regarding ACS, demonstrate the viability of this therapy for the treatment of knee OA, showing positive influence on pain and joint function without significant adverse effects.

No abstract