Chronic mild stress (CMS), a well-validated model of depression, was used to study the effects of the melatonin agonist and selective 5-HT 2C antagonist agomelatine (S 20098) in comparison with melatonin, imipramine, and fluoxetine. All drugs were administered either 2 h before (evening treatment) or 2 h after (morning treatment) the dark phase of the 12-h light/dark cycle. Chronic (5 weeks) evening treatment with agomelatine or melatonin (both at 10 and 50 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently reversed the CMS-induced reduction in sucrose consumption. The magnitude and time course of the action of both drugs was comparable to that of imipramine and fluoxetine (both at 10 mg/kg i.p.); however, melatonin was less active than agomelatine at this dose. The effect of evening administration of agomelatine and melatonin was completely inhibited by an acute injection of the MT 1 /MT 2 antagonist, S 22153 (20 mg/kg i.p.), while the antagonist had no effect in animals receiving fluoxetine or imipramine. When the drugs were administered in the morning, agomelatine caused effects similar to those observed after evening treatment (with onset of action faster than imipramine) but melatonin was ineffective. Moreover, melatonin antagonist, S 22153, did not modify the intakes in stressed animals receiving morning administration of agomelatine and in any other control and stressed groups tested in this study. These data demonstrate antidepressant-like activity of agomelatine in the rat CMS model of depression, which was independent of the time of drug administration. The efficacy of agomelatine is comparable to that of imipramine and fluoxetine, but greater than that of melatonin, which had no antidepressant-like activity after morning administration. While the evening efficacy of agomelatine can be related to its melatonin receptors agonistic properties, its morning activity, which was not inhibited by a melatonin antagonist, indicates that these receptors are certainly required, but not sufficient to sustain the agomelatine efficacy. It is therefore suggested that the antidepressant-like activity of agomelatine depends on some combination of its melatonin agonist and 5-HT 2C antagonist properties.

Any treatment that could positively modulate central neuropeptides levels would provide a promising therapeutic approach to the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with aging and/or neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, based on the activity in rodents, S 17092 (2S,3aS,7aS)-1{[(R,R)-2-phenylcyclopropyl]carbonyl}-2-[(thiazolidin-3-yl)carbonyl]octahydro-1H-indole) has been selected as a potent inhibitor of cerebral prolylendopeptidase (PEP). By retarding the degradation of neuroactive peptides, S 17092 was successfully used in a variety of memory tasks. These tasks explored short-term, longterm, reference and working memory in aged mice, as well as in rodents and monkeys with chemically induced amnesia or spontaneous memory deficits. S 17092 has also been safely administered to humans, and showed a clear peripheral expression of its mechanism of action through its inhibitory effect upon PEP activity in plasma. S 17092 exhibited central effects, as evidenced by EEG recording in healthy volunteers, and could improve a delayed verbal memory task. Collectively, the preclinical and clinical effects of S 17092 have suggested a promising role for this compound as an agent for the treatment of cognitive disorders associated with cerebral aging.

To confirm the antidepressant-like activity of agomelatine (S 20098), a melatonin agonist and 5-hydroxytryptamine2C antagonist, already reported in the chronic mild stress and forced swimming tests, the effects of agomelatine were investigated in the learned helplessness test and compared with those of imipramine, melatonin and a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine2C antagonist, SB-242 084. Agomelatine was administered for 5 days either once a day or twice a day, and the effects of pretreatment by a melatonin receptor antagonist, S 22153 (20 mg/kg/day), were studied. A deficit in avoidance learning was observed in helpless control animals. Agomelatine (10 mg/kg/day) administered once a day significantly reduced this deficit with an effect similar to that of imipramine. Effects of agomelatine were abolished by S 22153 pretreatment. Melatonin or SB-242 084 did not reduce the deficit of helpless control animals. These results confirm the antidepressant-like activity of agomelatine and suggest a role of melatonin receptors in its mechanism of action.

Chronic administration of antidepressants produces region-specific adaptive changes in the radioligand binding properties of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. We hypothesized that this effect of chronic antidepressant administration was owing to an alteration in NMDA receptor subunit composition. This hypothesis was examined using in situ hybridization with [35S]-labeled riboprobes to quantify the impact of chronic (16 d) injection with either imipramine (15 mg/kg) or citalopram (20 mg/kg) on the levels of transcripts encoding NMDA receptor subunits in mouse brain. These antidepressants altered the levels of mRNA encoding the zeta-subunit in a parallel fashion, with both drugs either reducing transcript levels (e.g., in the cortex, cerebellum, thalamus, and striatum) or producing no substantial effects (e.g., hippocampus). In contrast, these antidepressants often produced distinct, region-specific effects on mRNA levels encoding the epsilon family of subunits. For example, citalopram treatment produced widespread reductions in epsilon 1-subunit mRNA levels (e.g., in frontal cortex, CA2 of hippocampus, and amygdala), whereas imipramine reduced levels of this transcript only in the amygdala. Conversely, imipramine treatment produced widespread reductions in epsilon 2-subunit mRNA levels (e.g., in cortex, CA1-4 of hippocampus, and amygdala), whereas the effects of citalopram on levels of this transcript were largely restricted to amygdala. These findings indicate that long-term antidepressant treatment produces region-specific changes in expression of transcripts for NMDA receptor subunits, presumably altering NMDA receptor composition. Because subunit composition determines the physiological and pharmacological properties of NMDA receptors, these changes may play a critical role in the therapeutic actions of structurally diverse antidepressants.