Our results establish the face validity and convergent validity of ASEEGA for single-channel sleep analysis in healthy individuals. ASEEGA appears as a good candidate for diagnostic aid and automatic ambulant scoring.

Throughout the day, cognitive performance is under the combined influence of circadian processes and homeostatic sleep pressure. Some people perform best in the morning, whereas others are more alert in the evening. These chronotypes provide a unique way to study the effects of sleep-wake regulation on the cerebral mechanisms supporting cognition. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging in extreme chronotypes, we found that maintaining attention in the evening was associated with higher activity in evening than morning chronotypes in a region of the locus coeruleus and in a suprachiasmatic area (SCA) including the circadian master clock. Activity in the SCA decreased with increasing homeostatic sleep pressure. This result shows the direct influence of the homeostatic and circadian interaction on the neural activity underpinning human behavior.

Human morning and evening chronotypes differ in their preferred timing for sleep and wakefulness, as well as in optimal daytime periods to cope with cognitive challenges. Recent evidence suggests that these preferences are not a simple by-product of socio-professional timing constraints, but can be driven by inter-individual differences in the expression of circadian and homeostatic sleep-wake promoting signals. Chronotypes thus constitute a unique tool to access the interplay between those processes under normally entrained day-night conditions, and to investigate how they impinge onto higher cognitive control processes. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we assessed the influence of chronotype and time-of-day on conflict processing-related cerebral activity throughout a normal waking day. Sixteen morning and 15 evening types were recorded at two individually adapted time points (1.5 versus 10.5 hours spent awake) while performing the Stroop paradigm. Results show that interference-related hemodynamic responses are maintained or even increased in evening types from the subjective morning to the subjective evening in a set of brain areas playing a pivotal role in successful inhibitory functioning, whereas they decreased in morning types under the same conditions. Furthermore, during the evening hours, activity in a posterior hypothalamic region putatively involved in sleep-wake regulation correlated in a chronotype-specific manner with slow wave activity at the beginning of the night, an index of accumulated homeostatic sleep pressure. These results shed light into the cerebral mechanisms underlying inter-individual differences of higher-order cognitive state maintenance under normally entrained day-night conditions.

Sleep studies face new challenges in terms of data, objectives and metrics. This requires reappraising the adequacy of existing analysis methods, including scoring methods. Visual and automatic sleep scoring of healthy individuals were compared in terms of reliability (i.e., accuracy and stability) to find a scoring method capable of giving access to the actual data variability without adding exogenous variability. A first dataset (DS1, four recordings) scored by six experts plus an autoscoring algorithm was used to characterize inter‐scoring variability. A second dataset (DS2, 88 recordings) scored a few weeks later was used to explore intra‐expert variability. Percentage agreements and Conger's kappa were derived from epoch‐by‐epoch comparisons on pairwise and consensus scorings. On DS1 the number of epochs of agreement decreased when the number of experts increased, ranging from 86% (pairwise) to 69% (all experts). Adding autoscoring to visual scorings changed the kappa value from 0.81 to 0.79. Agreement between expert consensus and autoscoring was 93%. On DS2 the hypothesis of intra‐expert variability was supported by a systematic decrease in kappa scores between autoscoring used as reference and each single expert between datasets (.75–.70). Although visual scoring induces inter‐ and intra‐expert variability, autoscoring methods can cope with intra‐scorer variability, making them a sensible option to reduce exogenous variability and give access to the endogenous variability in the data.

Study Objectives: To assess the performance of the single-channel automatic sleep staging (AS) software ASEEGA in adult patients diagnosed with various sleep disorders. Methods: Sleep recordings were included of 95 patients (38 women, 40.5 ± 13.7 years) diagnosed with insomnia (n = 23), idiopathic hypersomnia (n = 24), narcolepsy (n = 24), and obstructive sleep apnea (n = 24). Visual staging (VS) was performed by two experts (VS1 and VS2) according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules. AS was based on the analysis of a single electroencephalogram channel (Cz-Pz), without any information from electro-oculography nor electromyography. The epoch-by-epoch agreement (concordance and Conger's coefficient [κ]) was compared pairwise (VS1-VS2, AS-VS1, AS-VS2) and between AS and consensual VS. Sleep parameters were also compared. Results: The pairwise agreements were: between AS and VS1, 78.6% (κ = 0.70); AS and VS2, 75.0% (0.65); and VS1 and VS2, 79.5% (0.72). Agreement between AS and consensual VS was 85.6% (0.80), with the following distribution: insomnia 85.5% (0.80), narcolepsy 83.8% (0.78), idiopathic hypersomnia 86.1% (0.68), and obstructive sleep disorder 87.2% (0.82). A significant low-amplitude scorer effect was observed for most sleep parameters, not always driven by the same scorer. Hypnograms obtained with AS and VS exhibited very close sleep organization, except for 80% of rapid eye movement sleep onset in the group diagnosed with narcolepsy missed by AS. Conclusions: Agreement between AS and VS in sleep disorders is comparable to that reported in healthy individuals and to interexpert agreement in patients. ASEEGA could therefore be considered as a complementary sleep stage scoring tool in clinical practice, after improvement of rapid eye movement sleep onset detection.