No abstract

The objective of this study is to explore histological and ultrastructural changes induced by Klingler's method. Five human brains were prepared. First, the effects of freezing-defrosting on white matter were explored with optical microscopy on corpus callosum samples of two brains; one prepared in accordance with the description of Klingler (1956) and the other without freezing-defrosting. Then, the combined effect of formalin fixation and freezing-defrosting was explored with transmission electron microscopy (EM) on samples of cingulum from one brain: samples from one hemisphere were fixed in paraformaldehyde-glutaraldehyde (para/gluta), other samples from the other hemisphere were fixed in formalin; once fixed, half of the samples were frozen-defrosted. Finally, the effect of dissection was explored from three formalin-fixed brains: one hemisphere of each brain was frozen-defrosted; samples of the corpus callosum were dissected before preparation for scanning EM. Optical microscopy showed enlarged extracellular space on frozen samples. Transmission EM showed no significant alteration of white matter ultrastructure after formalin or para/gluta fixation. Freezing-defrosting created extra-axonal lacunas, larger on formalin-fixed than on para/gluta-fixed samples. In all cases, myelin sheaths were preserved, allowing maintenance of axonal integrity. Scanning EM showed the destruction of most of the extra-axonal structures after freezing-defrosting and the preservation of most of the axons after dissection. Our results are the first to highlight the effects of Klingler's preparation and dissection on white matter ultrastructure. Preservation of myelinated axons is a strong argument to support the reliability of Klingler's dissection to explore the structure of human white matter.

Summary Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is the only imaging technique allowing the direct visualization of viruses, due to its nanometer‐scale resolution. Between the 1960s and 1990s, TEM contributed to the discovery of many types of viruses and served as a diagnostic tool for identifying viruses directly in biological samples, either in suspension or in sections of tissues or mammalian cells grown in vitro in contact with clinical samples. The diagnosis of viral infections improved considerably during the 1990s, with the advent of highly sensitive techniques, such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and PCR, rendering TEM obsolete for this purpose. However, the last 20 years have demonstrated the utility of this technique in particular situations, due to its “catch‐all” nature, making diagnosis possible through visualization of the virus, without the need of prior assumptions about the infectious agent sought. Thus, in several major outbreaks in which molecular techniques failed to identify the infectious agent, TEM provided the answer. TEM is also still occasionally used in routine diagnosis to characterize infections not diagnosed by molecular assays. It is also used to check the microbiological safety of biological products. Many biopharmaceuticals are produced in animal cells that might contain little‐known, difficult‐to‐detect viruses. In this context, the “catch‐all” properties of TEM make it possible to document the presence of viruses or virus‐like particles in these products.