The safety and efficacy of amiodarone and propafenone in converting atrial fibrillation or flutter after cardiac surgery were compared in a randomized double-blind trial. Eighty-four patients with sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias of more than 30 min' duration, stable hemodynamic status and neither preoperative atrial arrhythmias nor treatment with other antiarrhythmis drugs, were randomized to receive amiodarone (46 patients: 5 mg/kg over 15 min and then 15 mg/kg over the subsequent 24 h for non-converting) or propafenone (38 patients: 2 mg/kg over 15 in and then 10 mg/kg over the subsequent 24 h for non-converting). Nine of the 46 patients (19.5%) receiving amiodarone converted to sinus rhythm within 1 h following bolus injection compared with 17 of 38 patients (44.7%) treated with propafenone (P < 0.05). Within the 24 h study, 38 of 46 patients (82.6%) given amiodarone and 26 of 38 patients (68.4%) given propafenone were converted to sinus rhythm (P = NS). A significantly progressive reduction in ventricular response, already evident at 10th min from the start of treatment, was achieved in both groups of patients. Side effects occurred in six patients given propafenone (15.7%) and in five given amiodarone (10.8%) (P = NS). The two drugs were equally effective in converting postoperative atrial fibrillation and/or flutter after 24 h although propafenone was superior within the first hour.

No abstract

We conclude that, in our patients group, EVP of left ventricular aneurysm associated with coronary grafting improves clinical status after operation. We registered a trend for a mild hemodynamic worsening, irrespective of coronary artery disease except in those patients who had shown a normal postoperative contraction pattern.

Two patients underwent combined heart and lung surgery performed through a limited left anterior thoracotomy. Good exposure of the left pulmonary hilum and the left anterior descending artery was obtained, allowing left upper lobectomy combined with off-pump coronary bypass grafting. This approach avoids potential complications due to sternotomy, staged operations, and cardiopulmonary bypass. These cases show that a limited thoracotomy allows safe and effective combined lung and cardiac surgery in carefully selected patients.

Endoventriculoplasty with pericardial patch has been advocated to repair anteroseptal ventricular aneurysm, but not studies have reported the influence of this technique on diastolic left ventricular function. We have evaluated the changes on ventricular filling by means of pulsed Doppler recording of diastolic transmitral flow. Doppler analysis reveals three distinct spectral patterns: (1) normal, (2) inverted, and (3) restrictive. We have found an abrupt change from a preoperative normal to postoperative restrictive pattern in a significant minority of patients (8%) who underwent endoventriculoplasty. These patients had clinical and hemodynamic signs (New York Heart Association class, time from anterior myocardial infarction, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, pulmonary hypertension, and mitral regurgitation) of severe impairment but no differences were found in ejection fraction, aneurysmal extension, or remote myocardial function. Moreover, after operation they had a satisfactory ejection fraction, a low end-diastolic volume, and an apex-base length shorter than the predicted value for a normal population. The presence of a postoperative restrictive pattern of diastolic filling is a strong predictor of 3-month mortality and makes the medical treatment difficult. Caution must be taken to perform endoventriculoplasty in patients who are severely ill, especially those recently affected by myocardial infarction. When the clinical conditions dictate the operation, a nonenthusiastic volume reduction seems to be a prudent option.