Prehospital system delay in our patients was suboptimal. This is the first attempt at characterizing prehospital system delay in Singapore and forms the basis for improving efficiency of STEMI care.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the incidence and mortality of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) across the 3 main ethnic groups in Singapore, determine if there is any improvement in trends over the years and postulate the reasons underlying the ethnic disparity. Materials and Methods: This study consisted of 16,983 consecutive STEMI patients who sought treatment from all public hospitals in Singapore from 2007 to 2014. Results: Compared to the Chinese (58 per 100,000 population in 2014), higher STEMI incidence rate was consistently observed in the Malays (114 per 100,000 population) and Indians (126 per 100,000 population). While the incidence rate for the Chinese and Indians remained relatively stable over the years, the incidence rate for the Malays rose slightly. Relative to the Indians (30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality at 9% and 13%, respectively, in 2014), higher 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were observed in the Chinese (15% and 21%) and Malays (13% and 18%). Besides the Malays having higher adjusted 1-year all-cause mortality, all other ethnic disparities in 30-day and 1-year mortality risk were attenuated after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Conclusion: It is important to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of existing programmes and practices as the aetiology of STEMI evolves with time, and to strike a balance between prevention and management efforts as well as between improving the outcome of “poorer” and “better” STEMI survivors with finite resources. Key words: Chinese, Indian, Malay, STEMI

Introduction: The burden of frequent attenders (FAs) of emergency departments (EDs) on healthcare resources is underestimated when single-centre analyses do not account for utilisation of multiple EDs by FAs. We aimed to quantify the extent of multiple ED use by FAs and to characterise FAs. Methods: We reviewed nationwide ED attendance in Singapore data from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2018 (13 years). FAs were defined as patients with ≥4 ED visits in any calendar year. Single ED FAs and multiple ED FAs were patients who attended a single ED exclusively and ≥2 distinct EDs within the year, respectively. Mixed ED FAs were patients who attended a mix of a single ED and multiple EDs in different calendar years. We compared the characteristics of FAs using multivariable logistic regression. Results: We identified 200,130 (6.3%) FAs who contributed to1,865,704 visits (19.6%) and 2,959,935 (93.7%) non-FAs who contributed to 7,671,097 visits (80.4%). After missing data were excluded, the study population consisted of 199,283 unique FAs. Nationwide-linked data identified an additional 15.5% FAs and 29.7% FA visits, in addition to data from single centres. Multiple ED FAs and mixed ED FAs were associated with male sex, younger age, Malay or Indian ethnicity, multiple comorbidities, median triage class of higher severity, and a higher frequency of ED use. Conclusion: A nationwide approach is needed to quantify the national FA burden. The multiple comorbidities and higher frequency of ED use associated with FAs who visited multiple EDs and mixed EDs, compared to those who visited a single ED, suggested a higher level of ED burden in these subgroups of patients. The distinct characteristics and needs of each FA subgroup should be considered in future healthcare interventions to reduce FA burden. Keywords: ED overcrowding, ED reattendance, emergency medicine, frequent attenders, frequent flyers, multiple emergency department attendance