(1) Background: Continuing to observe the grafted bone mineral density (BMD) is essential to ensure the success of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate. This study elaborates on three methods that can be used to evaluate the progressive BMD. (2) Methods: Forty patients with unilateral or bilateral clefts receiving ABG were enrolled. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at 6 months (T1) and 2 years (T2) postoperatively. In CBCT, measurements were obtained on three different planes using the circle located 1 mm from the adjacent teeth (Method A), the largest circle within the defect (Method B), or the central circle with a diameter of 2 mm (Method C). The BMD was the average density of the three planes and was adjusted by pogonion density. Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of each method. Inter-rater reliability was confirmed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). (3) Results: For Method A, B, and C, the mean-adjusted BMD (BMD/pogonion density, BMDa) was 17.44%, 17.88%, and 17.69%, respectively, at T1 (p = 0.495), and 22.51%, 22.87%, and 22.74%, respectively, at T2 (p = 0.690); the density enhancement rates were 40.54%, 38.92%, and 43.15% (p = 0.382). Significant differences between the BMDa at T1 and T2 were observed (p < 0.001, <0.001, and 0.001, for Method A, B, and C, respectively). The volume of the grafted tissue remained stable during T1 and T2, and no significant correlation between density enhancement rate and volume loss was observed. (4) Conclusions: A significant increase in the BMD of grafted tissue was observed in the 2-year postoperative follow-up. The three methods for measuring BMDa via CBCT can be applied in post-ABG evaluations.

Background: Clear aligner therapy has an aesthetic advantage over fixed appliance therapy. However, to our knowledge, no study has objectively compared patient orthodontic and aesthetic outcomes between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies administered after orthognathic surgery (OGS). Methods: This study included patients with no history of congenital craniofacial deformities who underwent surgery-first OGS and received clear aligner or fixed appliance therapy. The patients' grades on the Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and scores on the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index were calculated before OGS (T0), after OGS (T1), and after orthodontic therapy (T2). Results: This study included 33 patients (clear aligner therapy, n = 19; fixed appliance therapy, n = 14). No considerable between-group differences were noted in the DHC and AC grades at T0, T1, or T2. Furthermore, percentage of reduction in the PAR index score was more significant in the clear aligner group (74.4%) than in the fixed appliance group (63.2%) from T0 to T1 (P = 0.035); however, no between-group differences were noted from T1 to T2 or from T0 to T2. Both groups exhibited substantially improved DHC grades, Aesthetic Component grades, and PAR index scores at T1 and T2. Conclusions: Patient outcomes were similar between the clear aligner and fixed appliance groups after orthodontic therapy. However, the former group exhibited more favorable immediate results after OGS than did the latter group. Thus, as an adjunct therapy for patients with malocclusion, clear aligner therapy may be more effective than fixed appliance therapy.

No abstract

Background: The present study evaluated the three-dimensional changes of the pharyngeal airway after orthognathic surgery (OGS) in patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts, and in unilateral cleft patients with and without pharyngeal flap (PF). Methods: Forty-five patients with unilateral or bilateral clefts undergoing OGS were enrolled. Cone-beam computed tomographic images were obtained before and after OGS. We measured the pharyngeal airway volumes, minimal cross-sectional area, and the horizontal displacement of facial landmarks. Results: The patients with bilateral cleft exhibited smaller initial velopharyngeal volume (unilateral, 8623 mm3; bilateral, 7781 mm3; P = 0.211), whereas the velopharyngeal volume increased significantly with a median of 744 mm3 after OGS (P = 0.031). The median horizontal displacement of A point was 2.9 and 2.6 mm among the patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts, respectively (P = 0.276), and the median horizontal displacement of B point was −2.9 and −3.3 mm among patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts, respectively (P = 0.618). The unilateral cleft patients with PF exhibited lower initial velopharyngeal volume (patients with a history of PF surgery, 7582 mm3; patients without a history of PF surgery, 8756 mm3; P = 0.129) and a lower increase in velopharyngeal volume (patients with a history of PF surgery, 437 mm3; patients without a history of PF surgery, 627 mm3; P = 0.739) after OGS. Conclusions: Midface hypoplasia and the decrease in the velopharyngeal volume were more prominent among the bilateral cleft patients and the unilateral cleft patients with PF. After OGS, the velopharyngeal volume increased considerably among the bilateral cleft patients, but no considerable differences were noted among the unilateral cleft patients with PF. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.