Thermally induced thunderstorm simulations were conducted with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in an idealized configuration to investigate the associated error growth and predictability. We conducted identical twin experiments with different topography and background winds to assess the impacts of these factors. The results showed that mountain topography restrains error growth at the early stage of convection development. This topographic effect is sensitive to mountain geometry and background winds: it was more noticeable in cases with higher and narrower mountains and difficult to see without background wind. The topographic effect and its sensitivity resulted from the different natures of convection initiation. However, the topographic effect became less apparent when moist convection continued growing and triggered rapid error growth. The predictability of thunderstorms is then limited at the timing after the convective activity reached its maximum. A smaller initial error or starting a simulation at a later time did not break this timing of predictability limit. Mountain topography also limitedly affected the timing of the maximum convective activity and the predictability limit. In contrast, background flows changed the convection evolution and the following predictability. The predictability limit assessed by rainfall suggested other aspects of the topographic effect. The domain-scale rainfall distribution and the intense accumulated rainfall can be adequately captured in the presence of mountains.
This is a PDF of a manuscript that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. As the article has not yet been formatted, copy edited or proofread, the final published version may be different from the early online release.This pre-publication manuscript may be downloaded, distributed and used under the provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. It may be cited using the DOI below.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.