No abstract

Battery characterization data is the basis for battery modeling and state estimation. It is generally believed that the higher the sampling frequency, the finer the data, and the higher the model and state estimation accuracy. However, scientific selection strategy for sampling frequency is very important but rarely studied. This paper studies the influence of sampling frequency on the accuracy of battery model and state estimation under four different sampling frequencies: 0.2 Hz, 1 Hz, 2 Hz, and 10 Hz. Then, a function is proposed to depict the relationship between accuracy and sampling frequency, which shows an optimal selection principle. The iterative identification algorithm is presented to identify the model parameters, and state-of-charge (SOC) is estimated via extended Kalman filter algorithm. Experimental results with different operating conditions clearly show the relationship between sampling frequency, accuracy, and data quantity, and the proposed selection strategy has high practical value and universality.

Efficient and accurate state of health (SoH) estimation is an important challenge for safe and efficient management of batteries. This paper proposes a fast and efficient online estimation method for lithium-ion batteries based on incremental capacity analysis (ICA), which can estimate SoH through the relationship between SoH and capacity differentiation over voltage (dQ/dV) at different states of charge (SoC). This method estimates SoH using arbitrary dQ/dV over a large range of charging processes, rather than just one or a limited number of incremental capacity peaks, and reduces the SoH estimation time greatly. Specifically, this method establishes a black box model based on fitting curves first, which has a smaller amount of calculation. Then, this paper analyzes the influence of different SoC ranges to obtain reasonable fitting curves. Additionally, the selection of a reasonable dV is taken into account to balance the efficiency and accuracy of the SoH estimation. Finally, experimental results validate the feasibility and accuracy of the method. The SoH estimation error is within 5% and the mean absolute error is 1.08%. The estimation time of this method is less than six minutes. Compared to traditional methods, this method is easier to obtain effective calculation samples and saves computation time.

No abstract

No abstract