We report on our search for microlensing towards the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Analysis of 5.7 years of photometry on 11.9 million stars in the LMC reveals 13 -17 microlensing events. A detailed treatment of our detection efficiency shows that this is significantly more than the ∼ 2 to 4 events expected from lensing by known stellar populations. The timescales ( t ) of the events range from 34 to 230 days. We estimate the microlensing optical depth towards the LMC from events with 2 < t < 400 days to be τ 400 2 = 1.2 +0.4 −0.3 × 10 −7 , with an additional 20% to 30% of systematic error. The spatial distribution of events is mildly inconsistent with LMC/LMC disk self-lensing, but is consistent with an extended lens distribution such as a Milky Way or LMC halo. Interpreted in the context of a Galactic dark matter halo, consisting partially of compact objects, a maximum likelihood analysis gives a MACHO halo fraction of 20% for a typical halo model with a 95% confidence interval of 8% to 50%. A 100% MACHO halo is ruled out at the 95% C.L. for all except our most extreme halo model. Interpreted as a Galactic halo population, the most likely MACHO mass is between 0.15 M ⊙ and 0.9 M ⊙ , depending on the halo model, and the total mass in MACHOs out to 50 kpc is found to be 9 +4 −3 × 10 10 M ⊙ , independent of the halo model. These results are marginally consistent with our previous results, but are lower by about a factor of two. This is mostly due to Poisson noise because with 3.4 times more exposure and increased sensitivity to long timescale events, we did not find the expected factor of ∼ 4 more events. Besides a larger data set, this work also includes an improved efficiency determination, improved likelihood analysis, and more thorough testing of systematic errors, especially with respect to the treatment of potential backgrounds to microlensing. We note that an important source of background are supernovae in galaxies behind the LMC.
We report on a search for long duration microlensing events towards the Large Magellanic Cloud. We find none, and therefore put limits on the contribution of high mass objects to the Galactic dark matter. At 95% confidence level we exclude objects in the mass range 0.3 M ⊙ to 30.0 M ⊙ from contributing more than 4 × 10 11 M ⊙ to the Galactic halo. Combined with earlier results, this means that objects with masses under 30 M ⊙ cannot make up the entire dark matter halo if the halo is of typical size. For a typical dark halo, objects with masses under 10 M ⊙ contribute less than 40% of the dark matter.
The nature of dark matter remains mysterious, with luminous material accounting for at most approximately 25 per cent of the baryons in the Universe. We accordingly undertook a survey looking for the microlensing of stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) to determine the fraction of Galactic dark matter contained in massive compact halo objects (MACHOs). The presence of the dark matter would be revealed by gravitational lensing of the light from an LMC star as the foreground dark matter moves across the line of sight. The duration of the lensing event is the key observable parameter, but gives non-unique solutions when attempting to estimate the mass, distance and transverse velocity of the lens. The survey results to date indicate that between 8 and 50 per cent of the baryonic mass of the Galactic halo is in the form of MACHOs (ref. 3), but removing the degeneracy by identifying a lensing object would tighten the constraints on the mass in MACHOs. Here we report a direct image of a microlens, revealing it to be a nearby low-mass star in the disk of the Milky Way. This is consistent with the expected frequency of nearby stars acting as lenses, and demonstrates a direct determination of a lens mass from a microlensing event. Complete solutions such as this for halo microlensing events will probe directly the nature of the MACHOs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.