Continuous manufacturing of solid oral dosage forms is promising for increasing the efficiency and quality of pharmaceutical production and products. In this study a whole train continuous direct compression (CDC) line has been provoked using challenging formulations typically prone to segregation in batch powder processing. Industrial compositions including components with variable size, bulk density and cohesive nature were selected. An experimental design, including variables such as API/mannitol particle size, API amount, powder feed rate and mixer speed, enabled the output quality of the provoked process to be assessed. Contrary to previous studies, a broader range of finished tablet quality attributes were probed, including content, uniformity of content, tensile strength as well as release performance. Overall, the continuous direct compression line was found to be a capable and efficient manufacturing process for the challenging compositions studied and surprisingly tolerable to handle the materials susceptible to segregation in typical batch settings. As expected, and given the 'fixed' apparatus configuration used in this study, the particulate material properties were found to have the most significant impact on the finished tablet quality attributes. The results emphasize the importance for taking a holistic approach when developing the operational windows and the strategy for control, e.g. by integrating the appropriate material properties, the actual apparatus design, and the relevant formulation design. The CDC line's ability to handle cohesive materials also seem to be one of the key advantages, thus confirming the recent promising results from other continuous direct compression studies.
Roller
compaction (RC) is a continuous process for solid dosage form manufacturing
within the pharmaceutical industry achieving similar goals as wet
granulation while avoiding liquid exposure. From a quality by design
perspective, the aim of the present study was to demonstrate the applicability
of statistical design of experiments (DoE) and multivariate modeling
principles to identify the Design Space of a roller compaction process
using a predictive risk-based approach. For this purpose, a reduced
central composite face-centered (CCF) design was used to evaluate
the influence of roll compaction process variables (roll force, roll
speed, gap width, and screen size) on the different intermediate and
final products (ribbons, granules, and tablets) obtained after roll
compaction, milling, and tableting. After developing a regression
model for each response, optimal settings were found which comply
with the response criteria. Finally, a predictive risk based approach
using Monte Carlo simulation of the factor variability and its influence
on the responses was applied which fulfill the criteria for the responses
in a space where there is a low risk for failure. Responses were as
follows: granule throughput, ribbon porosity, granules particle size,
and tablets tensile strength. The multivariate method orthogonal partial
least-squares (OPLS) was used to model product dependencies between
process steps e.g. granule properties with tablet properties. Those
results confirmed that the tensile strength reduction, known to affect
plastic materials when roll compacted, was not prominent when using
brittle materials. While direct compression qualities are frequently
used for roll compacted drug products because of their excellent flowability
and good compaction properties, this study confirmed earlier findings
that granules from these qualities were more poor flowing than the
corresponding powder blend.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.