A microfluidic platform combined with a deterministic model accounting for surface ligands reveals precious insights into the nanocrystal formation process. The comparison of on-line kinetic information with model predictions enables the derivation of temperature-dependent kinetic parameters for the CdSe model system. This fully generalizable approach represents a step forward toward a quantitative prediction of the nanocrystal size distribution, enabling the control and optimization of process performance and material properties.

Non-contact printing methods such as inkjet, electro hydrodynamic, and aerosol printing have attracted attention for their precise deposition of functional materials that are needed in printed electronics, optoelectronics, photonics, biotechnology, and microfluidics. In this article, we demonstrate printing of tapered optical waveguides with losses of 0.61 ± 0.26 dB/cm, with the best performing structure achieving 0.19 dB/cm. Such continuous features are indispensable for successfully printing functional patterns, but they are often corrupted by capillary forces. The proposed inkjet printing method uses these forces to align liquid bridges into continuous features, enabling the printing of smooth lines on substrates with arbitrary contact angles.

Force–distance curves recorded by frequency modulated atomic force microscopy (FM AFM) provide insight into the tip–sample mechanics. For quantitative analysis, FM AFM is able to separate conservative from dissipative forces by simultaneously measuring amplitude–distance and frequency–distance curves. Here, we report on the conservative forces in the gentle tip–sample contact of mesoscopic tips at low Tabor parameters. We introduce an analytical expression for the frequency shift based on the Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov (DMT) contact model to simplify the comparison between the experiment and theory. From the analytical formulas, a scaling law between the tip radius and minimal frequency shift is found, which is supported by experimental data. Although excellent fits for full frequency–distance curves are possible, the resulting material properties do not match the accepted literature values. We suspect that these flaws are a consequence of the incomplete treatment of attractive forces and DMT’s strain-stiffness approximation, rendering DMT-based models inappropriate to measure material properties by dynamic AFM in gentle contact.