No abstract

Unavailability of Plasma-Lyte A precludes the utility of traditional del Nido cardioplegia in many countries. This observational study aimed to evaluate myocardial preservation and clinical outcomes when using lactated Ringer’s solution as the base solution for del Nido cardioplegia as compared with our institute’s standard blood cardioplegia strategy. Eighty-nine adult patients underwent cardiac surgery for acquired heart disease from February 2017 to November 2017 either with del Nido cardioplegia (n = 44) or blood cardioplegia (n = 45). Clinical data and outcomes were compared. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Troponin T release was lower in the del Nido group on postoperative day 1 (.632 [.437, .907] vs. .827 [.599, 1.388] ng/mL; p = .009) and day 2 (.363 [.250, .451] vs. .549 [.340, .897] ng/mL; p = .002). The del Nido group exhibited lower total volume of cardioplegia administered (1,075 [1,000, 1,250] vs. 3,400 [2,700, 3,750] mL; p < .0001), fewer doses (1.6 ± .7 vs. 4.6 ± 1.3; p < .0001), and a decreased incidence of ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross-clamp removal (9.09 vs. 31.11%; p = .01). The del Nido group had shorter intensive care unit stays (2 [1, 2] vs. 3 [2, 4] days; p < .0001), hospital stays (7 [6, 10] vs. 9 [7, 10] days; p = .0002), less vasopressor and inotropic support (1 [1, 1] vs. 1 [1, 2] days; p = .0001), and lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (25 vs. 46.7%; p = .033). No mortality occurred and clinical outcomes were similar. The use of traditional del Nido cardioplegia ingredients added to lactated Ringer’s as the base solution provided either similar or superior myocardial protection than our blood cardioplegia strategy depending on the outcome measure analyzed. The use of lactated Ringer’s as a base solution may be an option for centers that do not have access to Plasma-Lyte. Further investigation and follow-up are warranted after this observational study.

Objectives: Anatomical lobectomy has always been the standard operative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, there have been emerging evidences suggesting that a subanatomical resection, such as segmentectomy, may yield the same treatment results, even in patients with higher-stage non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to compare overall 5-year survival rate and disease-free survival between lobectomy and segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: The retrospective study included 380 patients who underwent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer at Ramathibodi Hospital between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2020. Of 380 patients, 307 patients underwent lobectomy, while the other 73 patients underwent segmentectomy. Operative, admission, and follow-up data were collected from electronic medical records. Missing data were collected by telephone calls to patients or their relatives in deceased cases. Overall and disease-free survival were analyzed. Results: Median overall 5-year survival time after lobectomy and segmentectomy seemed to be different but not statistically significant (18.5 months versus 5.8 months, p = 0.127). Median disease-free survival time after lobectomy and segmentectomy was also similar (8.6 months versus 4.5 months, p = 0.511). Two deaths occurred during perioperative period, one from lobectomy group due to acute massive pulmonary embolism (0.3%) and the other from segmentectomy group due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure (1.4%). Conclusion: Lobectomy and segmentectomy result in similar overall 5-year survival rate and disease-free survival between these two comparison groups. Therefore, segmentectomy may be a potential alternative for operative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, a larger and randomized-controlled trial may be needed to further validate these results.